HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Antonio E. Martin-Ucar David A. Waller Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fernandez, M. I. Articles by Waller, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fernandez, M. I. Articles by Waller, D. A. Related Collections Pleura

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:671-674
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL

Does a thoracic epidural confer any additional benefit following video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax?

^a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
^b Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Received 8 October 2004; accepted 17 December 2004.

^* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 116 256 3959; fax: +44 116 236 7768. (E-mail: david.waller{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk).

Objective: Video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) bullectomy and apical pleurectomy has become the preferred procedure for recurrent or complicated primary spontaneous pneumothorax (SPN). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is the gold standard after open thoracic surgical procedures, its use in the management of minimally invasive procedures in this young population has not been extensively studied. Methods: From 1997 to 2003, a single surgeon performed 118 consecutive VATS pleurectomies for primary SPN. The perioperative course, analgesic requirements, hospital stay and long-term complications were compared for 22 (18%) patients in whom a patient-controlled thoracic epidural was used for analgesia and 96 (82%) patients who did not receive an epidural (parenteral opioids). A four-point verbal pain score (0–3) was recorded hourly in every patient at rest and on coughing following surgery. Results: One patient required additional surgery for evacuation of haemothorax. There were no mortalities or other major complications in the series. Overall median hospital stay was 3 (range 1–10) days, the incidence of long-term pain at 3 months was 6%, and the long-term recurrence rate was 3%. Despite parenteral opioids being discontinued significantly earlier than epidurals, pain scores were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in the duration of air-leaks, length of drainage, hospital stay, long-term pain and long-term paraesthesias between the two groups. Conclusions: Thoracic epidural analgesia does not contribute significantly to minimize neither perioperative nor long-term pain after VATS pleurectomy for primary SPN. The additional resource requirement in these patients is not justified.

Key Words: Regional analgesia • Minimally invasive surgery • Postoperative care

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Gaunt, A. E. Martin-Ucar, L. Beggs, D. Beggs, E. A. Black, and J. P. Duffy Residual apical space following surgery for pneumothorax increases the risk of recurrence. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 169 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]