EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Bernward Passlick
Erich Stoelben
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stoelben, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ludwig, C.
Right arrow Articles by Stoelben, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:693-696
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Resistance to pressure of the stump after mechanical stapling or manual suture. An experimental study on sheep main bronchus

Corinna Ludwiga, Ulrike Hoffartha, Jörg Haberstrohb, Wolfgang Schuttlerc, Bernward Passlicka,*, Erich Stoelbena

a Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abt. Thoraxchirurgie, Freiburg 79106, Germany
b Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Abt. Allgemein und Visceralchirurgie, Freiburg 79106, Germany
c Klinik für Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hanover 30623, Germany

Received 18 August 2004; received in revised form 15 November 2004; accepted 17 November 2004.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 761 270 2460; fax: +49 761 270 2499. (E-mail: ludwig{at}ch11.ukl.uni-freiburg.de).

Objective: In a previous experimental study on 60 freshly slaughtered pig trachea, a statistically significant better resistance to pressure was found after mechanical stapling compared to hand suture. The objective of this study was to determine the resistance to pressure of a bronchial stump depending upon the closure technique (manual vs. mechanical) used in sheep 14 days after pneumonectomy. Methods: Pneumonectomy was performed on 30 sheep, which were alternatively closed either by a double-layer running suture at 90° to the cartilaginous rings or with an automatic stapling device. Exactly 14 days after pneumonectomy, the animals were sacrificed and the trachea with the bronchial stump was retrieved. Sutures were placed under pressure until air leakage was observed. The air-leakage pressure was recorded digitally. Results: In both groups, there was no evidence of a bronchopleural fistula. As in the previous experimental study, mean values of air-leakage pressure revealed a large standard deviation in both groups (min. 0.16–max. 1.15bar). Unlike the results in the first experiment there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: After 14 days, when a bronchial stump is considered to be healed, the resistance to pressure of a mechanical suture is equal to that of the manual suture.

Key Words: Surgical procedures • Anastomoses • Suturing techniques • Bronchial closure • Staples







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.