EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Clemens Aigner
Gernot Seebacher
Gyorgy Lang
Wilfried Wisser
Walter Klepetko
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Klepetko, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Klepetko, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:757-761
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Extended donor criteria for lung transplantation—a clinical reality

Clemens Aignera, Guenther Winklera, Peter Jakscha, Gernot Seebachera, Gyorgy Langb, Sharokh Taghavia, Wilfried Wissera, Walter Klepetkoa,*

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
b Thoracic Surgery Clinic, Koranyi National Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary

Received 7 September 2004; received in revised form 31 December 2004; accepted 12 January 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 1 40400 5644; fax: +43 1 40400 5642. (E-mail: walter.klepetko{at}meduniwien.ac.at).

Objective: Standard lung donor criteria have been established on opinions and individual experiences rather than on existing evidence. Since the scarcity of donor organs is one of the major limitations to lung transplantation, extension of donor lung criteria might considerably increase the donor pool. This study therefore evaluates the outcome, achieved with the use of extended donors versus standard donors and aims to redefine lung donor criteria. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 98 consecutive primary lung transplantations from 94 donors from 1/2001 to 12/2002. Donors were classified as extended if they fulfilled at least one criteria: age >55 years, PaO2 at FiO2/PEEP 5 <300mmHg, tobacco history >20 pack years, inhalative drug abuse, presence of infiltration on chest X-ray or purulent secretions at bronchoscopy. Recipients were stratified in two groups according to whether they received a ‘standard’ or ‘extended’ organ. Postoperative complications, extubation time, ICU and hospital stay and survival were compared. Results: Twenty-three (24.5%) donors were extended. Twenty-six recipients (26.55%) received organs from extended donors. Differences in intubation times (12±2 days standard vs. 14±5 days extended, P=0.70), ICU stay (16±2 days standard vs. 18±5 days extended, P=0.74) and hospital stay (38±4 days standard vs. 40±6 days extended, P=0.71) were not statistically significant. Postoperative bleeding rates were comparable (n=14 standard vs. n=3 extended) as well as bronchial anastomotic complications (n=7 standard vs. n=3 extended). Three months survival was 88.89% in the standard group vs. 92.31% in the extended group. One year survival is comparable as well with 81.94 vs. 84.62%, respectively. Conclusions: The use of lung donors who fail to meet standard criteria does not impair short and medium term results compared to standard lung donors. The impact on long term development of BOS has yet to be evaluated. The strict application of standard lung donor criteria excludes a considerable number of lungs potentially suitable for transplantation, thus liberalisation of donor criteria might help to overcome donor shortage.

Key Words: Lung transplantation • Donors • Presumed consent




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Shihata, N. Ghorpade, D. Lien, and D. Modry
Ex vivo bilateral pulmonary embolectomy for donor lungs prior to transplantation.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2110 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. V. Venkateswaran, V. B. Patchell, I. C. Wilson, J. G. Mascaro, R. D. Thompson, D. W. Quinn, R. A. Stockley, J. H. Coote, and R. S. Bonser
Early Donor Management Increases the Retrieval Rate of Lungs for Transplantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1): 278 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Oto, B. J. Levvey, H. Whitford, A. P. Griffiths, T. Kotsimbos, T. J. Williams, and G. I. Snell
Feasibility and Utility of a Lung Donor Score: Correlation With Early Post-Transplant Outcomes
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. F. Angel, D. J. Levine, M. I. Restrepo, S. Johnson, E. Sako, A. Carpenter, J. Calhoon, J. E. Cornell, S. G. Adams, G. B. Chisholm, et al.
Impact of a Lung Transplantation Donor-Management Protocol on Lung Donation and Recipient Outcomes
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2006; 174(6): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.