EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Rajwinder Singh Jutley
Mohammed Wesam Khalil
Gaetano Rocco
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jutley, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jutley, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Chest wall

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:43-46
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia

Rajwinder Singh Jutley, Mohammed Wesam Khalil, Gaetano Rocco * , 1

Price Thomas Unit, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Herries Road, S5 7AU Sheffield, UK

Received 18 December 2004; received in revised form 24 February 2005; accepted 28 February 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 114 236 3399; fax: +44 114 261 0350. (Email: gaetano.rocco{at}btopenworld.com).

Objective: VATS using the conventional three ports is currently the technique of choice for blebectomy/bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. However, the procedure has recently been shown to have neurological complications related to the port sites. Uniportal VATS has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional three-port VATS. It is anticipated that the single incision will predispose to a lower incidence of neurological complications. Methods: We report our initial single surgeon experience of uniportal VATS (n=16) and provide a comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia to conventional three-port procedures (n=19) for the same pathology. Results: In both groups, the pneumothorax pathology was principally primary. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, spirometry, tissue resected, drainage time and inpatient stay. A difference was, however, noted in inpatient pain scores. The uniportal group had a lower median score of 0.4 (visual analogue range 0–4) while the three-port technique reported 0.8 (P=0.06, Mann–Whitney test). The maximum score trend was similar (1.4 vs. 2.6, respectively, P<0.001, Mann–Whitney test). Follow-up for uniportal and three-port VATS averaged 9.4±6.6 and 32.1±9.9 months, respectively. One patient in the three-port group had a pneumothorax recurrence. Three-port VATS also had a higher residual pain score (0.5) compared to uniportal VATS (0.3). Of clinical significance was the incidence of neurological complications. Eighty-six percent of uniportal patients reported no symptoms. The remaining experienced only mild ‘numbness’ or ‘swelling’. However, in the three-port group, only 42% reported no symptoms. A similar number experienced ‘numbness’. Two females described sexual dysfunction due to altered breast sensitivity. Seventeen percent (2/12) reported ‘pins and needles’. Conclusions: Uniportal VATS appears to be tolerable, safe and efficient in treating spontaneous pneumothorax in our series. Moreover, post-operative pain and paraesthesia incidence was lower than three-port VATS. Prospective randomised trials are important to evaluate this technique.

Key Words: Uniportal • VATS • Pain • Paraesthesia • Spontaneous pneumothorax




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Salati, A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, V. Sciarra, A. Soccetti, and A. Sabbatini
Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 63 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Hutter, S. Reich-Weinberger, W. Hitzl, and H. J. Stein
Sequels 10 years after thoracoscopic procedures for benign disease
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 32(3): 409 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. Givigliano, A. La Rocca, C. La Manna, L. Busiello, F. Longo, F. Scognamiglio, F. Ionna, and G. Rocco
Minimally invasive combined approach for an hourglass-shaped mass at the thoracic inlet
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 528 - 529.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Stefani, P. Natali, C. Casali, and U. Morandi
Reply to Margaritora et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 397 - 398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
A. Brunelli, F. Xiume, M. Refai, and A. Sabbatini
Bilateral staged uniportal VATS for synchronous lung cancers
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 658 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
G. Rocco, A. Brunelli, R. Jutley, M. Salati, F. Scognamiglio, C. La Manna, A. La Rocca, and N. Martucci
Uniportal VATS for mediastinal nodal diagnosis and staging
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 430 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. S. Jutley, G. Cooper, and G. Rocco
Extending video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for trauma: The uniportal approach
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1424 - 1424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. H. Burack
Reply to the Editor
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1424 - 1425.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Rocco, A. La Rocca, C. La Manna, F. Scognamiglio, M. D'Aiuto, R. Jutley, and N. Martucci
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pericardial window
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2006; 131(4): 921 - 922.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
C S H Ng, T W Lee, S Wan, and A P C Yim
Video assisted thoracic surgery in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: the current status.
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 82(965): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Rocco
Operative VATS: the need for a different intrathoracic approach
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 358 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.