HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Ian Andrew Nicholson Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bugge, E. Articles by Thomas, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bugge, E. Articles by Thomas, S. P. Related Collections Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:76-80
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL

Comparison of bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo experimental model

Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia

Received 29 September 2004; received in revised form 1 February 2005; accepted 2 February 2005.

^* Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 9845 6795; fax: +61 2 9845 8323. (Email: stuartpr{at}yahoo.com).

Objective: Linear atrial radiofrequency lesions have been used effectively for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In most cases an endocardial approach has been suggested. A method for epicardial placement of lesions would reduce the complexity of these procedures. We compared lesions created in ovine hearts in vivo using irrigated bipolar or unipolar handheld radiofrequency ablation devices. Methods: Radiofrequency lesions were produced around a left pulmonary vein, around the left atrial appendage and in the free wall of the right ventricle in ovine hearts. All lesions were created in the beating heart. A bipolar clamping device (n=7) or a handheld unipolar device (n=6) was used. Measurements of local electrograms and pacing thresholds were performed before and after ablation at each site to assess the electrical integrity of lesions. Tetrazolium and digital image analysis were used to assess lesion geometry. Results: In atrial tissue continuous transmural lesions were achieved more often with the bipolar than with the unipolar device (92.3 vs. 33.3%, P<0.02). In atrial tissue the reduction in signal amplitude caused by the lesions was significantly larger with the bipolar than the unipolar device (87.6±9.4% vs. 60.6±23.7% reduction, P<0.01). There was a significant relationship between loss of pacing capture and lesion transmurality (P<0.05). The bipolar device created narrower lesions than the unipolar device (4.1±0.9mm vs. 5.9±2.1mm, P<0.001). Conclusions: The bipolar clamping device produces narrower lesions which are more likely to be transmural and lead to electrical isolation of ablated tissue than those produced by the unipolar device. However, both devices failed to consistently produce transmural lesions using the epicardial beating heart technique studied, particularly in thicker tissues. High output pacing within the ablated tissue partially predicts lesion transmurality and be a guide to the need for further ablation. However, endocardial ablation or transmural bipolar ablation are likely to remain the techniques of choice for linear radiofrequency ablation in the atria until improved techniques are developed.

Key Words: Ablation • Atrium • Arrhythmia • Radiofrequency • Arrhythmia surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Kato, A. Usui, H. Oshima, T. Akita, and Y. Ueda Incomplete transmural ablation caused by bipolar radiofrequency ablation devices. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 251 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-i. Sakamoto, R. K. Voeller, S. J. Melby, S. C. Lall, N.-l. Chang, R. B. Schuessler, and R. J. Damiano Jr. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: The efficacy of a novel bipolar pen device in the cardioplegically arrested and beating heart. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1295 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Lall, S. J. Melby, R. K. Voeller, A. Zierer, M. S. Bailey, T. J. Guthrie, M. R. Moon, N. Moazami, J. S. Lawton, and R. J. Damiano Jr The effect of ablation technology on surgical outcomes after the Cox-maze procedure: A propensity analysis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 389 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Bakir, F. P. Casselman, P. Brugada, P. Geelen, F. Wellens, I. Degrieck, F. Van Praet, Y. Vermeulen, R. De Geest, and H. Vanermen Current Strategies in the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Literature and Onze Lieve Vrouw Clinic's Strategy Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 331 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Suwalski, G. Suwalski, N. Doll, F. Majstrak, A. Kurowski, and K. B. Suwalski Epicardial Beating Heart "Off-Pump" Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Non-Mitral Valve Patients Using New Irrigated Bipolar Radiofrequency Technology Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1876 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Saltman Must we cross the wall to get to the other side? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 224 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF]