EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ruyun Jin
Gary L. Grunkemeier
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:240-243
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Original articles

Additive vs. logistic risk models for cardiac surgery mortality

Ruyun Jin * , Gary L. Grunkemeier For the Providence Health System Cardiovascular Study Group

Providence Health System, Portland, OR, USA

Received 24 March 2005; received in revised form 5 April 2005; accepted 6 April 2005.

* Corresponding author. Address: Providence St Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, 9205 SW Barnes Road, LL33, Portland, OR 97225, USA. Tel.: +1 503 216 7276; fax: +1 503 216 7274. (Email: ruyun.jin{at}providence.org).

Abstract

Objective: Logistic regression is most often used to produce a cardiac operative risk model. But the logistic equation requires a computer to solve. Thus, simple additive models have been derived from logistic models by adding the odds ratios or modified coefficients. However, this simplification has no statistical justification, and the additive scores do not equal the original logistic probabilities. Methods: The EuroSCORE risk model is a very successful and widely used cardiac surgery risk model and it comes in both an additive and a full logistic version. We applied the EuroSCORE model to the 28,337 cardiac surgeries in the Providence Health System Cardiovascular Study Group database. The discrimination of the models was assessed by the c index. The comparison of the mortality predictions of the logistic and the additive model are mostly descriptive and graphical. Results: Theoretical considerations would predict that the additive model greatly underestimates the risk for the higher risk patients, and clinical data confirm this fact. For the 23,463 (83%) cases with complete data, the predicted mortality was 8.3% by the logistic model and 5.4% by the additive model. The discrimination (c index) of the additive (0.794) and logistic (0.791) models was equally good. A modified additive score is proposed (the mean of the logistic predicted mortality for each original additive score) which could be provided as a look-up table along with the scoring sheet. Conclusions: The additive EuroSCORE gives excellent discrimination, as good as the logistic risk model, but it greatly underestimates the risk of high-risk patients, compared to the logistic. The logistic equation should be used to predicate the mortality when possible. If this is not feasible, a modified additive score could be employed at the bedside. But the logistic should always be used for comparison of providers and for research publications.

Key Words: Additive model • Logistic model • Cardiac surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
F Bhatti, A D Grayson, G Grotte, B M Fabri, J Au, M Jones, B Bridgewater, and on behalf of the North West Quality Improvement Pr
The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk?
Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1817 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
R. Jin and G. L. Grunkemeier
Does the logistic EuroSCORE offer an advantage over the additive model?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 15 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.