|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:407-414
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL
Original articles |
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Lund, SE-21 85 Lund, Sweden
b Department of Nursing, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Received 10 March 2005; received in revised form 9 May 2005; accepted 11 May 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 46 17 70 16; fax: +46 46 17 72 07. (Email: bodil.ivarsson{at}med.lu.se).
Abstract
Objective: It is important that patients for whom cardiac surgery is planned are supplied with structured oral and written information regarding their disease and its treatment, so that they can understand and discuss the coming operation and the risk of complications. The aim was to describe patients' experiences of information regarding possible complications related to cardiac surgery, both before and after the operation. A comparison was made between patients who received detailed written information (intervention group) regarding possible complications and patients who received conventional information (control group). Methods: One hundred eighty-two patients were included in the intervention group and 156 in the control group. Questionnaires were distributed and experiences, anxiety and depression (the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), and avoidance or intrusion distress (the Impact of Event Scale, IES) were measured before and 8 weeks after the surgery. Results: Seventy-two percent of the intervention group and 69% of the control group wanted information about both common and rare complications. Patients in the intervention group were significantly more satisfied with all aspects of the information compared to the control group both pre- and post-operatively. There were no significant differences between the groups for either the HADS or the IES. Conclusion: Most, but not all, patients in the present study were positive to the extended written detailed information about risk of complications in connection with cardiac surgery. Detailed information can be a useful base for fruitful conversations between the health care personnel and the patients. The patients and their next of kin are informed, and better prepared if complications occur.
Key Words: Consent information Preoperative information Cardiac surgery Complications
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. V. Arnold, C. Decker, H. Ahmad, O. Olabiyi, S. Mundluru, K. J. Reid, G. E. Soto, S. Gansert, and J. A. Spertus Converting the Informed Consent From a Perfunctory Process to an Evidence-Based Foundation for Patient Decision Making Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2008; 1(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rankinen, S. Salantera, K. Heikkinen, K. Johansson, A. Kaljonen, H. Virtanen, and H. Leino-Kilpi Expectations and received knowledge by surgical patients Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 113 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Mishra Detailed preoperative information--cruelty or improving quality of informed consent Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 28(6): 910 - 911. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |