EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Axel Haverich
Martin Strüber
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, G.
Right arrow Articles by Strüber, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, G.
Right arrow Articles by Strüber, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - transplantation

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:454-460
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Original articles

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine induction therapy in pulmonary transplantation in miniature swine

Gregor Warnecke a , Murat Avsar a , Thomas Steinkamp a , Renate Reinhard a , Jost Niedermeyer b , André R. Simon a , Axel Haverich a , Martin Strüber a , *

a Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany
b Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany

Received 14 April 2005; accepted 18 May 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 511 532 6588; fax: +49 511 532 8446. (Email: strueber{at}thg.mh-hannover.de).

Abstract

Objective: Tacrolimus has been shown to provide superior immunosuppression in various solid organ transplant settings. The purpose of our study was to compare the survival of porcine lung allografts after induction with either cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus. Methods: Single lung transplantation from MHC mismatched donors was performed in 10 minipigs. Immunosuppression included 1.5mg/kg per day methylprednisolone and 1.0mg/kg per day azathioprine. CsA (n=5) was adjusted to trough levels of 300–500ng/ml, tacrolimus (n=5) was adjusted to 16–26ng/ml. All immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued on postoperative day (POD) 28. Allograft survival was monitored by sequential chest radiographs, bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy histology. Peripheral blood leukocytes were scanned for donor chimerism and CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD25 expression. Results: The animals survived a 4-week course of immunosuppression without radiological or histological signs of rejection on POD 28. Median allograft survival in CsA-treated animals was 55±15 days and all animals rejected their grafts within 42 days after withdrawal of immunosuppression. In tacrolimus-treated animals, median survival was 152±65 days with the longest survivor being electively sacrificed on POD 390 (P=0.0064). The degree of donor leukocyte chimerism and the frequency of CD4+CD25+T-cells were higher in the tacrolimus group, however, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of our study show that primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus is superior to cyclosporine after pulmonary allotransplantation in a large animal model.

Key Words: Lung transplantation • Tacrolimus • Cyclosporine • Primary immunosuppression







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.