EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boodhwani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boodhwani, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:65-70
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Mortality and myocardial infarction following surgical versus percutaneous revascularization of isolated left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis

Munir Boodhwani a , Fraser D. Rubens b , Frank W. Sellke a , Thierry G. Mesana b , Marc Ruel b , c , *

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
b Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Room H-3401, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1Y 4W7
c Department of Epidemiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada

Received 21 June 2005; received in revised form 25 July 2005; accepted 27 July 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 613 761 4893; fax: +1 613 761 5367. (Email: mruel{at}ottawaheart.ca).

Objective: Despite numerous studies comparing surgical versus percutaneous revascularization, the optimal treatment of patients with isolated left anterior descending (LAD) artery disease remains debated. We conducted a meta-analysis to study the early and mid-term outcomes following percutaneous and surgical treatment of isolated LAD disease. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases were searched and a hand search of bibliographies was conducted. Clinical data was extracted independently by two individuals. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) and meta-regression was employed to explain study heterogeneity. Stratified analyses were conducted and a Funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Eight randomized trials (1110 patients; median follow-up: 2.1 years, range: 0.5–5 years) and nine observational studies (12,209 patients; median follow-up: 3 years, range: 0.5–5.5 years) were identified and analyzed separately. Both randomized and observational studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of surgery compared to percutaneous therapy on mid-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.24–0.46] for randomized and 0.32 [0.24–0.41] for observational studies). Studies with >1 year of follow-up demonstrated a beneficial effect of surgery compared to percutaneous therapy on combined mortality and MI rates for randomized (RR [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.35–0.98]) and observational studies (RR [95% CI]: 0.81 [0.65–0.99]). The start year was identified as a source of study heterogeneity. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of isolated LAD disease is associated with reduced MACE, reduced mortality, and MI rates at mid-term follow-up, as well as lower recurrence of angina. Evolution of treatment strategies may explain some of the variability between studies.

Key Words: Coronary artery bypass • Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty • Stents • Meta-analysis • Mortality • Myocardial infarction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. Kappert, S.-M. Tugtekin, R. Cichon, M. Braun, and K. Matschke
Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: A word of caution implicated by a five-year follow-up.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2008; 135(4): 857 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. Takagi, T. Tanabashi, N. Kawai, and T. Umemoto
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for isolated left anterior descending artery disease is indispensable
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 548 - 548.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
O. Aziz, C. Rao, S. S. Panesar, C. Jones, S. Morris, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive internal thoracic artery bypass versus percutaneous revascularisation for isolated lesions of the left anterior descending artery
BMJ, March 24, 2007; 334(7594): 617 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Takagi, T. Kato, Y. Matsuno, and T. Umemoto
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus stenting.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 632 - 632.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Boodhwani and M. Ruel
Reply to takagi et Al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 633 - 633.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.