HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bittner, H. B. Articles by Mohr, F. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bittner, H. B. Articles by Mohr, F. W. Related Collections Lung - transplantation

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:210-215
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Aprotinin decreases reperfusion injury and allograft dysfunction in clinical lung transplantation

^a Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig of the University of Leipzig, Struempell Str. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
^b Pulmonary Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA

Received 17 October 2005; received in revised form 26 November 2005; accepted 2 December 2005.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 341 865 1422; fax: +49 341 865 1452. (Email: hartmuth.bittner{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de).

Objective: Primary graft dysfunction caused by ischemia–reperfusion injury is one of the most frequent causes of early morbidity and death after lung transplantation. We hypothesized that the perioperative management with aprotinin decreases the incidence of allograft reperfusion injury and dysfunction after clinical lung transplantation. Methods: Lung transplant databases of two transplant centers were used to investigate the incidence of severe post-transplant reperfusion injury (PTRI). We examined data of 142 patients who underwent either single lung (81) or bilateral sequential lung (61) transplantation for COPD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, and miscellaneous lung disorders between 1997 and 2000. Thirty patients were excluded due to heart–lung transplantation or lung transplantation for Eisenmenger's disease, re-transplantation, rejection, or deviation from the standardized triple immunosuppression protocol. The data of remaining 112 patients (control group, 64% single lung, 36% sequential bilateral lung transplants) were compared to the prospectively collected data of 59 lung transplant patients over the last 5 years. All of these 59 patients were managed perioperatively with aprotinin infusion. In addition, Euro-Collins-aprotinin procurement solution (Apt-EC group) was used for 50 donor lungs (58% single lung, 42% sequential bilateral lung transplants). Aprotinin in combination with low-potassium dextran (LPD) flush solution (Apt-LPD group) was used for the procurement of 34 lungs (59% single lung, 41% sequential bilateral lung transplants). The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade III injury score was used for the diagnosis of severe PTRI, which is based on a PaO₂–FIO₂ ratio of less than 200 mmHg. Results: Severe reperfusion injury grade III was observed in 18% of the control group. ECMO support was required in 25% of these patients. The associated mortality rate was 40%. Correlating factors for PTRI were donor age greater than 35 years (45%, p = 0.01, mean age 38 ± 8) and recipient pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 60 mmHg (48%, p < 0.05). Lung graft ischemic times (231 ± 14 min) and intraoperative techniques (cardiopulmonary bypass in 12%) were not associated with negative outcomes. Despite longer ischemic times (258 ± 36 min and 317 ± 85 min, respectively) and older donors (42 ± 12 years and 46 ± 12 years, respectively) in the aprotinin patient groups (Apt-EC and Apt-LPD group), the incidence of PTRI was markedly lower (6% and 9%, respectively). There was no mortality in the Apt-EC group and one patient died in the Apt-LPD group due to PTRI-induced graft failure. Conclusions: Severe PTRI increased short-term morbidity and mortality. The incidence of reperfusion injury was not dependent upon the duration of donor organ ischemia. The use of aprotinin in the perioperative patient management in lung transplantation had strong beneficial effects on the patient outcomes and decreased the incidence of post-transplant ischemia–reperfusion injury significantly.

Key Words: Clinical lung transplantation • Ischemia–reperfusion injury • Graft failure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Shuhaiber, K. Goldsmith, S. R. Large, and S. Tsui Does perioperative use of aprotinin reduce the rejection rate in heart transplant recipients? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 849 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Shuhaiber Unilateral as well as bilateral infiltrates should remain part of the definition of pulmonary graft dysfunction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 269 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. B. Bittner, C. Binner, S. Lehmann, T. Kuntze, A. Rastan, and F. W. Mohr Replacing cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation operations Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 462 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]