EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arjuna Weerasinghe
Pandelis Philippidis
Jonathan Day
Kaushik Mandal
Jonathan Anderson
Kenneth Taylor
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weerasinghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weerasinghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Molecular biology

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:312-318
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Platelet–monocyte pro-coagulant interactions in on-pump coronary surgery

Arjuna Weerasinghe a , * , Thanos Athanasiou b , Pandelis Philippidis a , Jonathan Day a , Kaushik Mandal b , Oliver Warren b , Jonathan Anderson a , Kenneth Taylor a

a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, University of London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK
b Department of Cardiac Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, University of London, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK

Received 25 May 2005; received in revised form 25 October 2005; accepted 14 November 2005.

* Corresponding author: Tel.: +44 776 611 5590; fax: +44 208 740 7019. (Email: a.weerasinghe{at}ic.ac.uk).

Objective: Platelets and monocytes possess haemostatic properties, but the clinical effect of platelet–monocyte interactions on haemostasis following coronary surgery is not known. The study characterises the platelet and monocyte responses in cardiac surgery and its impact on haemostasis. Methods: In 1342 patients, changes in white blood cell counts (WBC), monocyte counts and platelet counts were measured. PMC formation was analysed by flow-cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against pan-leucocyte marker CD45, monocyte marker CD14 and platelet marker CD42. TF expression was determined using monoclonal antibodies against, CD45, CD14 and human-TF. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Changes in monocyte and platelet counts over time were considered as repeated measures data, and analysed using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of several factors on blood loss. Results: A monocytosis occurs with on-pump coronary surgery, but is less pronounced than with off-pump surgery. No difference was seen in patients having redo-surgery or more complex cardiac surgery. Factors associated with monocytosis on multivariate analysis were higher body mass index (p = 0.02), diabetes (p = 0.035) and smoking (p = 0.01). Older patients manifested a lower response (p < 0.001). Cross-clamp fibrillation was associated with a lower (p = 0.048) monocytic response than was cardioplegia. PMC formation dropped following administration of heparin, peaked at 5 min of CPB, and declined by 2 h of CPB (p = 0.04). A return towards preoperative levels was found during postoperative days 1–5. No significant change in monocyte TF expression occurred. The mean postoperative blood loss was 581.2 ± 292.8 ml, and inversely related to increasing preoperative platelet counts (p < 0.001), and to higher monocyte % counts (p = 0.012). Patients, who were female (p < 0.001), had higher body mass indices (p < 0.001), and higher core body temperatures during surgery (p = 0.013), as well as patients having perioperative aprotinin (p < 0.001) related to less blood loss. Conclusions: A higher postoperative platelet count as well as monocyte% significantly and independently decreases postoperative blood loss following cardiac surgery.

Key Words: Platelets • Monocyte • Cardiopulmonary bypass • Coronary artery bypass surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
P. Farneti, S Sbrana, D Spiller, A. Cerillo, F Santarelli, D Di Dario, P. Del Sarto, and M Glauber
Reduction of blood coagulation and monocyte-platelet interaction following the use of a minimal extracorporeal circulation system (Synergy(R)) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
Perfusion, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 49 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.