HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Simon McGuirk Max Baghai David J. Barron William J. Brawn Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shebani, S. O. Articles by Brawn, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shebani, S. O. Articles by Brawn, W. J. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic Congenital - cyanotic Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:397-405
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using Contegra^® valved conduit: natural history and conduit performance under pressure

^a Paediatric Cardiac Unit, Paediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, B4 6LT Birmingham, UK
^b Paediatric Cardiology Department, Glenfield hospital, Leicester, UK

Received 5 August 2005; received in revised form 14 November 2005; accepted 15 November 2005.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 121 3339437; fax: +44 121 3339441. (Email: david.barron{at}bch.nhs.uk).

Objective: To assess the performance of the bovine Contegra^® valved conduit used for right ventricular (RV) outflow tract reconstruction, particularly in relation to post-operative RV pressure. Methods: Follow-up study of 64 consecutive right ventricular to pulmonary artery-conduit implants in 62 patients between January 2000 and April 2003. The majority of cases were forms of pulmonary atresia/VSD (n = 24, 39%) or Fallot's tetralogy (n = 13, 21%). Thirteen cases (21%) had aortic atresia, truncus arteriosus or discordant connections with pulmonary atresia/VSD. Twelve cases (19%) were conduit replacements. Echocardiography was performed for a median follow-up of 14 months (range 0–38 months). Results: Median age at implantation was 13.8 months (range 0.1–244 months) and median weight was 8.9 kg (range 2.1–84.1 kg). Thirty-eight patients (59.4%) were <10 kg at the time of surgery. Early mortality was 6.4% (n = 4). During follow-up there were four explantations (one for endocarditis and three for conduit dilatation) and 16 (28.6%) catheter interventions. Overall freedom from intervention at 1 and 3 years was 71 ± 6% and 53 ± 11%, respectively. Freedom from conduit-specific reintervention was 66 ± 11% at the end of the study period. Reintervention was associated with small conduits (p = 0.04), age <1 year (p = 0.04) and with high RV/LV pressure ratio in the immediate post-operative period (p = 0.0003). On multivariate analysis, the RV/LV pressure ratio was the strongest single factor predicting the overall reintervention (OR 5.45). Acquired distal conduit stenosis at suture line was the commonest indication for conduit-specific reintervention and was associated with the smaller conduits. The conduits explanted for dilatation showed neointimal proliferation, thrombosis, calcification and chronic inflammation. Conclusions: The Contegra conduit is widely applicable to RVOT reconstruction with satisfactory mid-term results. However, there is a significant incidence of conduit-related complications, particularly with the smaller conduits. Adverse performance was strongly associated with high RV/LV pressure ratio at completion of surgery. We would recommend cautious use of the conduits in patients with predicted high RV/LV pressure ratios, where careful monitoring of conduit performance is crucial. There is some element of unpredictability, which adds to the importance of close follow-up. Further studies are needed to explore the issues of thrombogenicity, degeneration, possible ‘rejection’, and the potential role of anti-platelet and anti-inflammatory modulation.

Key Words: Bovine Contegra^® valved conduit • Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction • Right ventricular to left ventricular pressure ratio

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Hickey, B. W. McCrindle, E. H. Blackstone, T. Yeh Jr., F. Pigula, D. Clarke, C. I. Tchervenkov, J. Hawkins, and the CHSS Pulmonary Conduit Working Group Jugular venous valved conduit (Contegra(R)) matches allograft performance in infant truncus arteriosus repair Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 890 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Corno and E. S. Mickaily-Huber Comparative computational fluid dynamic study of two distal Contegra conduit anastomoses Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Sinzobahamvya, B. Asfour, M. Boscheinen, J. Photiadis, C. Fink, E. Schindler, V. Hraska, and A. M. Brecher Compared fate of small-diameter Contegras(R) and homografts in the pulmonary position Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 209 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Rastan, T. Walther, I. Daehnert, J. Hambsch, F. W. Mohr, J. Janousek, and M. Kostelka Bovine jugular vein conduit for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: evaluation of risk factors for mid-term outcome. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1308 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]