HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Martin Utley Domenico Pagano Tom Treasure Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gallivan, S. Articles by Treasure, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gallivan, S. Articles by Treasure, T. Related Collections Education Cardiac - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:431-433
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

MADCAP: a graphical method for assessing risk scoring systems

^a Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, UK
^b University Hospital Birmingham, UK
^c Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospitals Medical School, London, UK

Received 7 October 2005; received in revised form 19 December 2005; accepted 21 December 2005.

^_* Corresponding author. Fax: +44 207 813 2814. (Email: s.gallivan{at}ucl.ac.uk).

Objective: We set out to develop a method for assessing the performance of clinical risk models over the spectrum of risks and to assess the performance of the EuroSCORE risk model used in cardiac surgery. Methods: We developed a graphical method for assessing the performance of clinical risk models over the spectrum of risks. To illustrate the technique, we analysed retrospective data concerning 9268 patients that underwent cardiac surgery and for whom both the additive EuroSCORE prediction of risk of morality and vital status at 30 days were available. Results: The graphical tool developed, called MADCAP (Mean Adjusted Deaths Compared Against Predictions), can be used to highlight systematic features of the performance of a clinical risk model. Its use in the current study indicates that the additive version of the EuroSCORE model seems to underestimate risk amongst low-risk cases (0% and 1%). Otherwise the score systematically favours risk avoiding behaviour as the risk model underestimates mortality for 2–6% prediction but not at 7% and above. Conclusion: The robustness of case-mix adjusted audit is dependent on the performance of the risk scoring system over the entire spectrum of risk. If we are to use risk adjustment of mortality rates when comparing outcomes obtained by different units or individual surgeons, it is essential that we continually review the performance of the risk adjustment method. The MADCAP method presented here provides a useful tool to this end.

Key Words: Risk models • Audit • Cardiac surgery • Mortality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Mestres, M. A. Castro, E. Bernabeu, M. Josa, R. Cartana, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Miro, J. Mulet, and the Hospital Clinico Endocarditis Study Group Preoperative risk stratification in infective endocarditis. Does the EuroSCORE model work? Preliminary results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gallivan, M. Utley, D. Pagano, and T. Treasure Reply to Lim: Concerning MADCAP plots Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1152 - 1152. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Lim Interpreting MADCAP: parallelism not divergence Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1151 - 1152. [Full Text] [PDF]