|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:693-697
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London WC1N 3JH, UK
b Clinical Operational Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, University College London, UK
c Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
Received 14 October 2005; received in revised form 13 January 2006; accepted 16 January 2006.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 78138159; fax: +44 50 74321281. (Email: tsangv{at}gosh.nhs.uk).
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a graphical method of risk-stratified outcome analysis in paediatric cardiac surgery to provide a means of continuous, prospective performance monitoring and allow real-time detection of change in outcomes. Methods: Risk-adjusted survival following open-heart surgery was prospectively measured over a 15-month period (n = 460). Outcomes were charted using variable life-adjusted display (VLAD) charts, which indicate the cumulative difference in observed minus expected survival against the cumulative number of cases performed. Risk stratification was based on RACHS-1 (risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery) risk category and age at surgery, using our previously published risk model. The probability of deviation in performance from the expected baseline level was determined using a mathematical model. Results: By the end of the series, observed survival (443/460 = 96.3%) exceeded that predicted by the risk model (434.5/460 = 94.5%), equivalent to a one-third reduction in expected mortality. Mathematical modelling indicated a 15% likelihood that this difference would have occurred by random variation alone, suggesting the outcomes represented genuine improvement. Conclusions: VLAD charts provide an effective, easily visualised display of surgical performance and can be applied to paediatric cardiac surgery. Early detection of change, whether improvement or deterioration, is important for ongoing quality assurance within a cardiac surgery programme.
Key Words: Audit Cardiac surgery Performance monitoring Surgical outcomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. T. Tsang, K. L. Brown, M. J. Synnergren, N. Kang, M. R. de Leval, S. Gallivan, and M. Utley Monitoring risk-adjusted outcomes in congenital heart surgery: does the appropriateness of a risk model change with time? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 87(2): 584 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Holzhey, S. Jacobs, T. Walther, M. Mochalski, F. W. Mohr, and V. Falk Cumulative sum failure analysis for eight surgeons performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 663 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sergeant Editorial comment: Online performance monitoring in cardiac surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 697 - 698. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |