EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Holger Hendrix
Johannes Merk
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendrix, H.
Right arrow Articles by Merk, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendrix, H.
Right arrow Articles by Merk, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:957-963
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

A randomized trial of automated versus conventional protocol-driven weaning from mechanical ventilation following coronary artery bypass surgery

Holger Hendrix a , * , Michael E. Kaiser a , Roger D. Yusen b , 1 , Johannes Merk a

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Regensburg, Germany
b Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA

Received 12 September 2005; received in revised form 18 January 2006; accepted 20 January 2006.

* Corresponding author. Address: Justizvollzugskrankenhaus NRW, Abteilung für Chirurgie, Hirschberg 9, 58730 Fröndenberg, Germany. Tel.: +49 2373 7580; fax: +49 2373 758368. (Email: holger_hendrix{at}hotmail.com).

Objective: The Siemens servo 300 A ventilator has an automode function that allows automated weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation. Spontaneous breathing triggers the ventilator. After two spontaneously triggered breaths, the ventilator automatically changes from mandatory mechanical ventilation to spontaneous ventilation. If spontaneous breathing or triggering does not occur, the Siemens servo 300 A ventilator changes from spontaneous ventilation back to mandatory mechanical ventilation. We compared the effects of automated versus conventional protocol-driven weaning on the time until extubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. In addition, we studied the effects of the mode of weaning on hemodynamic and physiologic parameters. Methods: Twenty consecutive male patients without respiratory disease scheduled for CABG at the University Hospital of Regensburg were entered into the study. Patients were randomized to postoperative ventilation with the Siemens 300 A/automode ventilator (group A, n = 10) or with the Siemens 300 ventilator (group B, n = 10). All patients were weaned from ventilation according to a standardized protocol. Results: On average, patients in group A were younger and had lower pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and higher cardiac output compared to patients in group B. However, patients in group A had longer ischemic and bypass times compared to patients in group B. Postoperative use of analgesia and sedation were similar in both groups. Time from tracheal intubation until extubation was 2 h shorter in patients assigned to automode ventilation compared to patients assigned to conventional ventilation (mean time group A 7.9 h, group B 10.0 h; p = 0.069). Peak airway pressure was reduced by 2 cm H2O at the beginning of spontaneous ventilation in group A compared to group B. After extubation, cardiac index showed a greater increase in patients assigned to group A compared to those in group B. Conclusions: Automode ventilator weaning trended toward more rapid extubation than did conventional protocol-driven ventilation in conjunction with a standardized weaning protocol. Physiologic and hemodynamic factors were better in patients using automode ventilation compared to patients using conventional ventilation. Automode ventilation was well tolerated and did not induce significant adverse effects.

Key Words: Automode ventilation • Conventional protocol-driven ventilation • Coronary artery bypass surgery • Cardiovascular–pulmonary interactions • Time until extubation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Hendrix, M. E. Kaiser, R. D. Yusen, and J. Merk
Reply to schadler et Al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 416 - 417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Schadler, G. Schmitz, I. Frerichs, and N. Weiler
Automatic weaning from mechanical ventilation - no progress in the last 10 years?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 415 - 416.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.