HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kubitz, J. C. Articles by Reuter, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kubitz, J. C. Articles by Reuter, D. A. Related Collections Anesthesia Chest wall Lung - basic science Cardiac - physiology

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:90-95
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions

^a Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Großhadern University Hospital, Munich, Germany
^b Institute for Surgical Research, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
^c Department of Anaesthesiology, Center for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamburg-Eppendorf University-Medical Center, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

Received 8 February 2006; received in revised form 3 April 2006; accepted 5 April 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg-Eppendorf University-Medical Center, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 40 42803 2415; fax: +49 40 42803 6703. (Email: jkubitz{at}gmx.de).

Objective: Intermittent positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect cardiac preload. Their effect is dependent on chest wall compliance. This study compares the effects of intermittent positive pressure ventilation and PEEP on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. Materials and methods: Fourteen anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (25–40 kg) were studied. Central blood volume was assessed using global end-diastolic volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by thermodilution. Further, left and right ventricular stroke volume variations were determined with ultrasonic flow probes placed around the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta, respectively. Measurements were performed during mechanical ventilation without and with PEEP (15 cmH₂O) in open and closed chest conditions. Results: With the chest closed mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, global end-diastolic volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume were significantly lower when compared to open chest conditions. Concomitantly, right ventricular, but not left ventricular stroke volume variation increased significantly. Applying PEEP led to a significant reduction of cardiac output, stroke volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume, with a concomitant increase in left and right ventricular stroke volume variation both during open and closed chest conditions (all P-values < 0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that PEEP increases right and left ventricular stroke volume variation both during open and closed chest conditions. The concomitant reduction of right ventricular end-diastolic volume further indicates that PEEP has a preload reductive effect during open chest conditions, too.

Key Words: PEEP • Open chest • Closed chest • Global end-diastolic volume • Stroke volume variation