HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Michael O. Murphy Michael G. Walker Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murphy, M. O. Articles by Walker, M. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murphy, M. O. Articles by Walker, M. G. Related Collections Anesthesia Education Chest wall

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:223-227
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Upper dorsal endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: a comparison of one- and two-port ablation techniques

Department of Vascular Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK

Received 17 January 2006; received in revised form 29 March 2006; accepted 5 April 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 161 2764525; fax: +44 161 2768014. (Email: stephanie.dalton{at}cmmc.nhs.uk).

Objective: Facial blushing and hyperhidrosis, particularly in the facial, axillary or palmar distribution, are socially, professionally, and psychologically debilitating conditions. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy can be carried out through multiple ports or by using a single port and a modified thoracoscope with integrated electrocautery. We reviewed our own experience to compare outcomes between these methods. Methods: One hundred and nine consecutive endoscopic thoracic sympathectomies performed on 96 patients (M:F, 30:66) were examined with respect to operative method, symptom control, and patient satisfaction. Complete follow-up was available on 144 treated sides in 77 patients (80.2%), 38 treated with two ports, 39 performed by a one-port procedure. Mean age was 32.6 years (range 18–63) with a median follow-up of 25 months (range 5–85). Pooled data showed that the mean duration hospital stay was 1.6 nights with no deaths, conversions, or neurological injuries. Results: The one-port group showed superior outcomes in terms of hospital stay, rate of postoperative pneumothorax, and the need for chest drain insertion; however, there was no correlation between number of ports and patient satisfaction. The mean overall satisfaction rating out of 5 was 3.3 with 76.6% of patients rating the outcome as 3 or more. 90.9% had an initial improvement in symptoms, although 21 patients (27.3%) described a late return of symptoms. Conclusion: Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy can be safely and effectively carried out using a single port with similar results to the traditional two-port procedure. The one-port procedure may allow for a shorter duration of stay and lower complication rate.

Key Words: Adult • Sympathectomy • Thoracoscopy • Minimally invasive surgery • Outcomes (includes mortality and morbidity)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Rocco Endoscopic VATS sympathectomy: the uniportal technique MMCTS, May 7, 2007; 2007(0507): 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]