EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Reza Tavakoli
Michele Genoni
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganter, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganter, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, C. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:278-284
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot

Michael T. Gantera, Antoinette Monnb, Reza Tavakolic, Michele Genonic, Richard Klaghoferd, Lukas Furrere, Hanspeter Honeggerb, Christoph K. Hofere,*

a Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
b Institute of Hematology and Oncology, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
c Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
d Department of Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
e Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland

Received 25 December 2005; received in revised form 11 April 2006; accepted 8 May 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 44 466 2209; fax: +41 44 466 2743. (Email: Christoph.hofer{at}triemli.stzh.ch).

Objective: Kaolin-based activated clotting time assessed by HEMOCHRON (HkACT) is a clinical standard for heparin monitoring alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, aprotinin is known to prolong not only celite-based but also kaolin-based activated clotting time. Overestimation of activated clotting times implies a potential hazardous risk of subtherapeutic heparin anticoagulation. Recently, a novel ‘aprotinin-insensitive’ activated clotting time test has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer (SaiACT). The aim of our study was to evaluate SaiACT in patients undergoing CPB in presence of heparin and aprotinin. Methods: Blood samples were taken from 44 elective cardiac surgery patients at the following measurement time points: baseline (T0); before CPB after heparinization (T1 and T2); on CPB, before administration of aprotinin (T3); 15, 30, and 60 min on CPB after administration of aprotinin (T4, T5, and T6); after protamine infusion (T7). On each measurement time point, activated clotting time was assessed with HkACT and SaiACT, both in duplicate. Furthermore, the rate of factor Xa inhibition and antithrombin concentration were measured. Statistical analysis was done using Bland and Altman analysis, Pearson's correlation, and ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni–Dunn correction. Results: Monitoring anticoagulation with SaiACT showed reliable readings. Compared to the established HkACT, SaiACT values were lower at all measurement time points. On CPB but before administration of aprotinin (T3), SaiACT values (mean ± SD) were 44 ± 118 s lower compared to HkACT. However, the difference between the two measurement techniques increased significantly on CPB after aprotinin administration (T4–T6; 89 ± 152 s, P = 0.032). Correlation of ACT measurements with anti-Xa activity was unchanged for SaiACT before and after aprotinin administration (r 2 = 0.473 and 0.487, respectively; P = 0.794), but was lower for HkACT after aprotinin administration (r 2 = 0.481 and 0.361, respectively; P = 0.041). On CPB after administration of aprotinin, 96% of all ACT values were classified as therapeutic by HkACT, but only 86% of all values were classified therapeutic if ACT was determined by SaiACT. Test variability was comparable for SaiACT and HkACT. Conclusions: The use of SaiACT may result in more consistent heparin management that is less affected by aprotinin and a corresponding increase in heparin administration for patients receiving aprotinin.

Key Words: Activated clotting time (ACT) • Aprotinin • Kaolin • Anticoagulation • Measurement techniques • Coagulation • Cardiopulmonary bypass




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. T. Ganter and C. K. Hofer
Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1366 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.