HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Omer Dzemali Ivo Martinovic Anton Moritz Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wittlinger, T. Articles by Moritz, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wittlinger, T. Articles by Moritz, A. Related Collections Cardiac - other

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:436-442
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts patency with different magnetic resonance technologies

^a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
^b Department of Heart Surgery, University Hospital, Baldingerstraße, 35033 Marburg, Germany

Received 19 December 2005; received in revised form 27 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Fax: +49 6732 65370. (Email: thomaswittlinger{at}t-online.de).

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences in the assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and the evaluation of distal anastomoses with a spin echo sequence (Haste). Patients and methods: Twenty-five patients were examined with all the three techniques and 185 patients with 481 distal anastomoses were examined with the Haste sequence at a 1.5 TMR scanner and coronary angiography. A two-dimensional T₂-weigthed breath-hold half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo sequence (Haste), a Navigator sequence and a gadolinium-enhanced Fisp-3-D sequence were performed. All images were evaluated independently by a radiologist and cardiologist and compared to the conventional coronary angiography. The observers were blinded to the coronary angiography findings, but informed in regard to the surgical graft anastomosis. Results: With the Haste sequence 80% of the distal anastomoses were recognized. The sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of the distal anastomosis with the Haste sequence was 94% and 75%. The Navigator and the Fisp-3-D sequences showed a sensitivity of 74% and 94% and a specificity of 78% and 88%. Conclusion: The best results were achieved with the Haste sequence, a reliable assessment of graft patency of the distal anastomosis is possible. The best imaging of proximal IMA segments was possible with the Fisp-3-D sequence. Due to the low sensitivity and specificity, the use of the Navigator sequence was stopped in our center. Further improvements of the spatial resolution and the image quality are necessary to recommend this MR techniques for routine clinical use.

Key Words: Coronary artery bypass grafts • Haste sequence • Magnetic resonance imaging