HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Malek, M. H. Articles by Housh, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malek, M. H. Articles by Housh, T. J. Related Collections Chest wall

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:637-643
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Review

Pulmonary function following surgical repair of pectus excavatum: a meta-analysis

^a Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 110 Ruth Leverton Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0806, USA
^b Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA
^c Department of Psychology, California State University-Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA
^d Department of Kinesiology, California State University-Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA

Received 20 April 2006; received in revised form 3 July 2006; accepted 10 July 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 402 472 2690; fax: +1 402 472 1587. (Email: mmalek{at}unlserve.unl.edu).

The purpose of this study was to use a meta-analytical technique to examine the efficacy of surgical repair of pectus excavatum on pulmonary function. Studies were retrieved via computerized literature searches, cross-referencing from original and review articles. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) reporting quantitative measures of preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function; (2) published in the English language; (3) indexed between January 1960 and September 2005; (4) reporting the duration between which preoperative and postoperative assessments were conducted; and (5) describing the pulmonary assessment procedures. The titles and abstracts of potentially relevant articles were reviewed to determine whether they met the criteria for inclusion. Twelve studies representing 313 pectus excavatum patients met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Random-effects modeling yielded a mean weighted effect size (ES) for pulmonary function which was statistically nonsignificant (ES = 0.08, 95% CI = –0.20 to 0.35; P = 0.58). The findings of the present study indicated that surgical repair of pectus excavatum does not significantly improve pulmonary function. These findings, however, may be a result of testing pulmonary function under conditions in which pectus excavatum does not manifest itself.

Key Words: Chest wall deformity • Lung function • Respiratory physiology • Surgery • Ventilation