EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Leif Dernevik
Ali Belboul
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dernevik, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rådberg, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dernevik, L.
Right arrow Articles by Rådberg, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Pleura

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:209-213. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.038
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Initial experience with the world's first digital drainage system. The benefits of recording air leaks with graphic representation

Leif Dernevik*,1, Ali Belboul, Göran Rådberg

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

Received 7 August 2006; received in revised form 17 October 2006; accepted 23 October 2006.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Änggården, S- 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden. Tel.: +46 31 3427513; fax: +46 31 417991. (Email: leif.dernevik{at}vgregion.se).

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a new digital drainage system, the DigiVentTM Chest Drainage System that gives accurate measurements of air leakage and pleural pressures and can display those measurements over time. Methods: The DigiVentTMChest Drainage System was tested in three steps: Step 1; first clinical use in five patients, Step 2; management and acceptance in further 15 patients and Step 3; reliability in routine use in 50 patients. Result: The results from Steps 1 and 2 showed that the system was good enough for extended use. The results from Step 3 showed excellent clinical performance, however, we experienced device malfunctions in four cases without any consequences for the patients. The cause of the malfunctions was identified and steps taken to prevent their further occurrence. Conclusion: The ability of the DigiVentTM to measure airflow and present mean values for 1, 3 and 6 h proved to be very practical. The ability to save data and present curves for the entire course of treatment will be an advantage for research in the field of lung surgery.

Key Words: Postoperative pneumothorax • Chest drainage • Air leak • Chest tubes • Pleural drainage systems • Lung resection




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Varela, M. F. Jimenez, N. M. Novoa, and J. L. Aranda
Postoperative chest tube management: measuring air leak using an electronic device decreases variability in the clinical practice
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 28 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.