EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Staffan Bjessmo
Jenny Vedin
Torbjörn Ivert
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bjessmo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ivert, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bjessmo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ivert, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum
Right arrow Pleura
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:372-375. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.027
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Comparison of three different chest drainages after coronary artery bypass surgery — a randomised trial in 150 patients

Staffan Bjessmoa,*, Susanne Hylandera, Jenny Vedina, Dag Mohlkertb, Torbjörn Iverta

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
b Department of Thoracic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 28 November 2006; accepted 15 December 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 851770822; fax: +46 8322701. (Email: staffan.bjessmo{at}karolinska.se).

Objective: Drainage of blood from the mediastinum and pleura following open cardiac procedures is usually carried out using one or more large-bore plastic chest tubes. Recently small diameter siliastic drains have been reported to evacuate blood with a better patient comfort. The efficacy and safety of different chest tubes have not yet been fully evaluated. Methods: One hundred fifty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomised to have either Blake® 24F (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ), Argyle® 32F plastic (Tyco Healthcare, Tullamore, UK) or Jostra® 32F silastic (Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) drains inserted for evacuation of postoperative bleeding. Bleeding rate per hour, total blood loss, patient discomfort during drain removal, residual pleural fluid at chest X-ray 3 days and 3 weeks after the operation were recorded. Results: Bleeding pattern and total bleeding did not differ significantly in the three groups. Median blood loss was 615 ml (quartile range 390–820 ml) in the Blake-group, 750 ml (quartile range 430–870 ml) in the Jostra-group and 580 ml (quartile range 450–750 ml) in the Argyle-group, respectively (p = 0.17). Pain at removal the day after the operation was similar in the three groups. Residual fluid in the left pleura did not differ significantly at 3 days (p = 0.41) or at 3 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.42). Conclusions: None of the three chest tubes was superior to drain postoperative bleeding or considering pain at removal. Local clinical routines and cost aspects should be the guide in choosing drainage system for open cardiac operations.

Key Words: Coronary bypass surgery • Chest tube • Bleeding • Randomised






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.