HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Christos Alexiou George Doukas Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alexiou, C. Articles by Spyt, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alexiou, C. Articles by Spyt, T. J. Related Collections Electrophysiology - arrhythmias Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:586-591. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.039
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

The effect of preoperative atrial fibrillation on survival following mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation

^a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Groby Rd, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK
^b Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK
^c Department of Cardiology, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, UK

Received 20 September 2006; received in revised form 11 December 2006; accepted 12 December 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 116 2563991; fax: +44 116 2563077. (Email: tom.spyt{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk).

Objective: There is conflicting evidence with regard to the impact of preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) on the post mitral valve (MV) repair on the early and late outcome. Methods: A total of 349 patients undergoing various MV repair procedures for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) between 1997 and 2003 were studied. Preoperatively, 152 (44%) of these patients were in AF and 197 (56%) patients were in sinus rhythm (SR). The clinical features and the outcome in these two cohorts of patients were compared. Results: The patients in the AF group were older than their counterparts in the SR group (66 ± 7 vs 62 ± 9 years) (p = 0.01), had a higher mean NYHA class score (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.2 ± 0.7) (p = 0.04) and were more likely to have impaired left ventricular function (60% vs 36%) (p < 0.0001). A similar proportion of patients in the AF (38%) and SR (30%) groups had additional cardiac surgical procedures (p = 0.12). Operative mortality was 3.9% in AF group versus 0.5% in SR group (p = 0.04), and operative morbidity was 27% versus 17%, respectively (p = 0.03). At latest follow up, 4% of patients that were in SR preoperatively developed AF; conversely, 2% of the patients in the AF group converted to SR. The rates of recurrent grade II or III MR (4% vs 5%) (p = 0.8) and MV re-operation (2.6% vs 2.5%) (p = 1.0) were similar in the AF and SR groups. Kaplan–Meier survival at 7 years was 75 ± 6% versus 90 ± 3% (p = 0.005). On Cox proportional hazards regression model, impaired LV function [(p = 0.02), hazard ratio 0.25 (95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 0.078–0.84)] and AF [(p = 0.03), hazard ratio 2.70 (95% C.I. 1.09–6.68)] were significant adverse predictors of survival. Conclusions: This study shows that in patients undergoing MV repair for degenerative MR, preoperative AF has a major negative impact on the early and late survival.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Mitral valve repair • Survival