EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Omar Mangoush
James Kinross
Martin Hayward
Fabio Bartolozzi
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangoush, O.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mangoush, O.
Right arrow Articles by Athanasiou, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:1058-1069. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.029
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved


Review

Heparin-bonded circuits versus nonheparin-bonded circuits: an evaluation of their effect on clinical outcomes

Omar Mangousha,*, Sanjay Purkayasthab, Saleem Haj-Yahiac, James Kinrossb,d, Martin Haywarda, Fabio Bartolozzie, Ara Darzib,d, Thanos Athanasioub,d

a National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Hospital, UCLH, London, UK
b Department of Biosurgery & Surgical Technology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
c National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, UK
d National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK
e Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK

Received 24 July 2006; received in revised form 30 December 2006; accepted 15 January 2007.

* Corresponding author. Address: The Heart Hospital, UCLH, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK. Tel.: +44 207 5738888. (Email: omangoush{at}yahoo.co.uk).

Heparinization of the blood contact surface in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits has been promoted as an important step in the development of open heart surgery. As it decreases the inflammatory response resulting from the extracorporeal circulation, it may have a positive effect on clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis was carried out to examine if heparin-bonded circuits (HBCs) reduce the need for blood products and improve overall clinical outcome. A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of HBCs compared with non-HBCs. Primary outcomes assessed were postoperative blood/blood-product transfusion and blood loss. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, acute postoperative myocardial infarction, stroke, re-sternotomy for postoperative bleeding, wound infection, atrial fibrillation, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital-length of stay (LOS). Random effects meta-analytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups. Quality of the included studies and heterogeneity were assessed. From an initial review of 762-published studies, 41-randomized trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, leaving 3434-patients’ data for analysis. HBCs significantly decreased the incidence of blood transfusion required (OR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.6:0.9, P = 0.004). It also significantly decreased re-sternotomy (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4:0.8, P = 0.002), duration of ventilation (WMD = –1.3 h; 95% CI = –1.9:–0.6, P < 0.001), ICU-LOS (WMD = –9.3 h; 95% CI = –14.7:–3.9, P < 0.001) and hospital-LOS (WMD = –0.5 day; 95% CI = –0.9:–0.1, P = 0.02). HBCs had no effect on other adverse events evaluated. Although HBCs showed a positive effect on some of the clinical outcomes, we identified only marginal differences for other outcomes. Further evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of this technology is required.

Key Words: Heparin-bonded circuit • Cardiopulmonary bypass • Perfusion • Meta-analysis

Abbreviations: HBCs = heparin-bonded circuit • NHBCs = nonheparin-bonded circuit • LOS = length of stay • AF = atrial fibrillation • CI = confidence intervals • ICU = intensive care unit • RCT = randomized controlled trial • OR = odds ratio • WMD = weighted mean difference • MeSH = medical subject headings • PRC = packed red cells • FFP = fresh frozen plasma • QUORUM = quality of reporting of meta-analyses • MI = myocardial infarction • CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Mangoush
Reply to Ranucci
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 704 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ranucci
Clinical impact of heparin-bonded circuits: when a meta-analysis does not clear out the clouds
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 703 - 704.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.