EJCTS Click here to locate an Ethicon representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow On-line Video
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Patrick Ruchat
Ludwig Karl von Segesser
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruchat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kappenberger, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruchat, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kappenberger, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:90-95. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.02.031
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Use of a biophysical model of atrial fibrillation in the interpretation of the outcome of surgical ablation procedures

Patrick Ruchata,*, Lam Dangb, Jürg Schlaepferc, Nathalie Viragd, Ludwig Karl von Segessera, Lukas Kappenbergerc

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
b Signal Processing Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
c Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
d Medtronic Europe, Tolochenaz, Switzerland

Received 5 September 2006; received in revised form 13 February 2007; accepted 20 February 2007.

* Corresponding author. Address: Service de Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel.: + 41 21 314 2280; fax: + 41 21 314 2278. (Email: Patrick.Ruchat{at}chuv.hospvd.ch).

Objective: To determine the adequacy of ‘in silico biophysical models of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the design of different ablation line patterns. Background: Permanent AF is a severe medical problem for which (surgical) ablation is a possible treatment. The ideal ablation pattern remains to be defined. Methods: Forty-six consecutive adult patients with symptomatic permanent drug refractory AF underwent mitral surgery combined with non-transmural, (n = 20) and transmural (n = 26) radiofrequency Minimaze. The fraction of ‘in vivo conversions to sinus rhythm (SR) in both groups was compared with the performance of the fraction of ‘in silico conversions observed in a biophysical model of permanent AF. The simulations allowed us to study the effectiveness of incomplete and complete ablation patterns. A simulated, complete, transmural Maze III ablation pattern was applied to 118 different episodes of simulated AF set-up in the model and its effectiveness was compared with the clinical results reported by Cox. Results: The fraction of conversions to SR was 92% ‘in vivo and 88% ‘in silico’ (p = ns) for transmural/complete ablations, 60% respectively 65% for non-transmural/incomplete Minimaze (p = ns) and 98% respectively 100% for Maze III ablations (p = ns). The fraction of conversions to SR ‘in silico correlated with the rates ‘in vivo’ (r 2 = 0.973). Conclusions: The fraction of conversions to SR observed in the model closely corresponded to the conversion rate to SR post-surgery. This suggests that the model provides an additional, non-invasive tool for optimizing ablation line patterns for treating permanent AF.

Abbreviations: AF = atrial fibrillation • AFL = atrial flutter • SR = sinus rhythm • RF = radiofrequency • APD = action potential duration • TAFT = time to atrial fibrillation termination • MV = mitral valve • DV = double (aortic and mitral) valve • TV = tricuspid valve • IVC = inferior vena cava • CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass • ACC = aortic cross clamping • LAA = left atrial appendage • RAA = right atrial appendage

Key Words: Atrium • Fibrillation • Ablation • Surgery • Biophysical modeling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. I. Paraskevas
Applications of statins in cardiothoracic surgery: more than just lipid-lowering
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 377 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Ruchat, N. Virag, L. Dang, J. Schlaepfer, E. Pruvot, and L. Kappenberger
A biophysical model of atrial fibrillation ablation: what can a surgeon learn from a computer model?
Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi71 - vi76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.