EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:370-376. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.030
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Balakrishnan Mahesh
Ravi Pillai
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahesh, B.
Right arrow Articles by Pigott, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahesh, B.
Right arrow Articles by Pigott, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology

Does furosemide prevent renal dysfunction in high-risk cardiac surgical patients? Results of a double-blinded prospective randomised trial

Balakrishnan Mahesh*, Boyd Yim, Desiree Robson, Ravi Pillai, Chandana Ratnatunga, David Pigott

Cardiothoracic Center, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom

Received 27 August 2007; received in revised form 18 December 2007; accepted 20 December 2007.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Harefield UB9 6JH, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 7951 033090; fax: +44 1895 828970. (Email: b.mahesh{at}rbht.nhs.uk).

Objective: Renal dysfunction following cardiac surgery is more apparent in high-risk patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction, diabetes and impaired left-ventricular function, and following complicated procedures involving prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this prospectively randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study was to evaluate reno-protective effect of low-dose furosemide infusion in this high-risk group. Methods: Patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 µmol/l (1.4 mg/dl), left-ventricular ejection fraction <50%, congestive heart failure, diabetes, or procedures involving prolonged CPB were randomised to receive either saline at 2 ml/h (n = 21), or furosemide at 4 mg/h (n = 21). Infusion was commenced after induction of anaesthesia and continued for 12 h postoperatively. Renal dysfunction was defined as >50% increase in serum creatinine postoperatively, or >130 µmol/l (1.4 mg/dl), or requirement for haemodialysis, or all of these. In patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 µmol/l, >50% increase over preoperative levels was used to define postoperative renal dysfunction. Results: Following cardiac surgery, patients receiving furosemide had a higher urine output (3.4 ± 1.2 ml/kg/h in furosemide group and 1.2 ± 0.5 ml/kg/h in placebo group; p < 0.001), higher postoperative fluid requirement (4631 ± 1359 ml in furosemide group and 3714 ± 807 ml in placebo group, p = 0.011), and lower urinary-creatinine (2 ± 1.3 µmol/l in furosemide group and 5.9 ± 2.5 µmol/l in placebo group p < 0.001). Both groups had significant increase in retinol binding protein/creatinine ratio (7.2 ± 6 to 3152 ± 1411 in furosemide group; 4.9 ± 2.1 to 2809 ± 1125 in placebo group; p < 0.001) and peak serum creatinine (98 ± 33 to 177 ± 123 µmol/l in furosemide group; 96 ± 20 to 143 ± 87 µmol/l in placebo group; p < 0.001), and a significant decrease in peak creatinine-clearance (64.3 ± 29.4 to 39.1 ± 16.6 ml/min in furosemide group; 65.5 ± 38.6 to 41.8 ± 17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p < 0.001) following cardiac surgery, implying significant renal injury following cardiac surgery. Peak creatinine levels (177 ± 123 µmol/l in furosemide group and 143 ± 87 µmol/l in placebo group; p = 0.35) and peak creatinine-clearance (39.1 ± 16.6 ml/min in furosemide group and 41.8 ± 17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p = 0.61) were similar in the two groups. Importantly, there was no difference in incidence of renal dysfunction between the furosemide group (9/21) and the control group (8/21) (relative risk 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6–2.2; p = 0.99). Conclusions: Our randomised trial did not demonstrate any benefit of furosemide-infusion postoperatively in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. Although urinary output increased with furosemide, there was no decrease in renal injury, and no decrease in incidence of renal dysfunction.

Key Words: Furosemide • Retinol binding protein • Creatinine-clearance • Renal failure • High-risk cardiac surgery







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.