HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Torsten Doenst Michael A. Borger Richard D. Weisel Terrence M. Yau Vivek Rao Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Doenst, T. Articles by Rao, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Doenst, T. Articles by Rao, V. Related Collections Cardiac - other Extracorporeal circulation Myocardial protection

Relation between aortic cross-clamp time and mortality — not as straightforward as expected

^a Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
^b Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany

Received 21 September 2007; received in revised form 3 January 2008; accepted 3 January 2008.

^_* Corresponding author. Address: Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, 4N-464, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. Tel.: +1 416 340 3562; fax: +1 416 340 3337. (Email: vivek.rao{at}uhn.on.ca).

Objective: Due to modern techniques of cardio protection, less attention has been paid to aortic cross-clamp (XCL) times. However, patients with impaired cardiac contractile function are still at increased perioperative risk, which may be partially due to an increased susceptibility to myocardial ischemia. We tested whether XCL times are associated with perioperative mortality in patients with preserved versus poor left ventricular function. Methods: We determined predictors of operative mortality on all patients undergoing cardiac surgery with aortic cross-clamping in our institution between 1990 and 2003. We excluded patients with markedly prolonged XCL times (>120 min, n = 1426) in order to limit the effect of intraoperative technical difficulties and their known association with poor outcomes. Of the included patients (n = 27,215), 99.8% received antegrade, retrograde, or combined blood cardioplegia. Results: Overall mortality was 2.2%. Multivariable analysis revealed that XCL time was an independent predictor of mortality for patients with LVEF >40% (odds ratio 1.014 per min of XCL, CI 1.01–1.02). However, XCL time was not a predictor in patients with LVEF <40%, mainly due to high mortality in patients with short XCL times. Mortality of patients with an LVEF <40% was the same or higher at cross-clamp times of 1–30 min than at 91–120 min. Conclusions: Despite modern techniques of cardio protection, XCL time remains an independent predictor of mortality in patients with preserved preoperative contractile function. The unexpected lack of risk prediction by aortic cross-clamp time in patients with low ejection fraction appear to be due to a high mortality rate when XCL times were short.

Key Words: Adult cardiac surgery • Mortality • Cross-clamp time • Risk factors

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Doenst, H. Bugger, M. Schwarzer, G. Faerber, M. A. Borger, and F. W. Mohr Three good reasons for heart surgeons to understand cardiac metabolism Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 862 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]