HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Wulf Sienel Andreas Kirschbaum Bernward Passlick Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sienel, W. Articles by Passlick, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sienel, W. Articles by Passlick, B. Related Collections Lung - cancer

Sublobar resections in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: segmentectomies result in significantly better cancer-related survival than wedge resections

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany

Received 31 July 2007; received in revised form 27 November 2007; accepted 10 December 2007.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 761 270 2457; fax: +49 761 270 2499. (Email: wulf.sienel{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de).

Objective: Sublobar resections spare pulmonary function and offer a method of increasing resection rates in patients with lung cancer and limited functional operability. Previous studies demonstrated an increased local recurrence rate following wedge resections compared to segmentectomies in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a prognostic impact of this observation has never been shown and is still under debate. Therefore, this study has been performed to analyse the cancer-related survival of sublobar resections in stage IA patients. Methods: Over a 17-year period 87 patients underwent sublobar complete resection (R0) of stage IA NSCLC via thoracotomy. Sublobar resection was reserved for patients with cardiopulmonary impairment. Wedge resections with selective lymphadenectomy were performed in 31 patients (36%) and segmentectomies with systematic lymphadenectomy in 56 patients (64%). Patient characteristics, functional parameters, tumour specifics and follow-up duration were analysed concerning their distribution between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier curves were compared and possible joint effects between prognostic parameters were analysed by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: The median follow-up duration was 45 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender (p = 0.11), age (p = 0.08), American Society of Anesthesiology physical performance status (ASA)-score (p = 0.32), forced expiratory volume in 1 s FEV₁ (p = 0.08), tumour size (p = 0.30), histology (p = 0.17), grading (p = 0.12), complication rate (p = 0.15) and follow-up duration (p = 0.29). The mean number of dissected lymph nodes in segmentectomies (12 ± 6) was higher than in wedge resections (6 ± 3) (p = 0.0001). The 5-year survival rate was 63%. There were significantly less locoregional recurrences (p = 0.001), an equal distribution of distant metastases (p = 0.53) and a better cancer-related survival (p = 0.016) following segmentectomies compared to wedge resections. Cox regression analysis showed that the prognostic effect of the resection type was independent from gender, age, ASA-score, respiratory function, tumour size, tumour histology, grading and number of dissected lymph nodes (p = 0.04, relative risk 1.16). Conclusions: Studies investigating survival after sublobar resection of stage IA NSCLC should always distinguish between anatomical segmentectomies and wedge resections. If limited functional operability requires a sublobar resection of stage IA NSCLC, segmentectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy should be preferred.

Key Words: Lung neoplasm • Surgery • Prognosis • Survival rate • Local recurrence • Sublobar resection

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Brunelli, A. Charloux, C. T. Bolliger, G. Rocco, J-P. Sculier, G. Varela, M. Licker, M. K. Ferguson, C. Faivre-Finn, R. M. Huber, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy) Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2009; 34(1): 17 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Shapiro, T. S. Weiser, J. P. Wisnivesky, C. Chin, M. Arustamyan, and S. J. Swanson Thoracoscopic segmentectomy compares favorably with thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients with small stage I lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1388 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Rami-Porta and M. Tsuboi Sublobar resection for lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2009; 33(2): 426 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lanuti, A. Sharma, S. R. Digumarthy, C. D. Wright, D. M. Donahue, J. C. Wain, D. J. Mathisen, and J.-A. O. Shepard Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2009; 137(1): 160 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]