|
|
||||||||
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Regional Heart and Vascular Center at St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
b Department of Surgery, University of Toledo – College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, USA
Received 6 September 2007; received in revised form 16 January 2008; accepted 24 January 2008.
* Corresponding author. Address: Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, Yvonne Viens, SGM, Research Institute, St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center, 2222 Cherry Street, MOB2, Suite 1250, Toledo, OH, 43608, USA. Tel.: +1 419 251 4998; fax: +1 419 251 0320. (Email: Robert_Habib{at}mhsnr.org).
Objectives: The evidence supporting the survival benefit of multiple arterial grafts in the general coronary bypass surgery (CABG) population is compelling. Alternatively, results of studies comparing 2 versus 1 internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts in diabetics have reported conflicting survival data. The use of radial versus ITA as the second arterial conduit has not been studied. Methods: We obtained complete death follow-up in 1516 consecutive diabetic [64 ± 10 years (mean ± SD). Insulin/no insulin: There were 540 (36%)/976 (64%)] primary isolated CABG patients all with
1 ITA grafts. The series included 626 ITA/radial (41%) and 890 ITA/vein (59%) patients. Using separate radial-use propensity models, we matched one-to-one 475 (76%) ITA/radial to 475 (53%) unique ITA/vein patients; each including 166 insulin and 309 no insulin patients. Results: Unadjusted survival was markedly better for (1) ITA/radial (94.3%, 86.7% and 70.4% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively) versus ITA/vein (91.8%, 74.5% and 53.8%; p
<
0.0001) and (2) for no insulin (94.2%, 82.8% and 65.5%) versus insulin (90.4%, 73.1% and 49.2%; p
<
0.0001). In matched patients, 11-year Kaplan–Meier analysis showed essentially identical ITA/radial and ITA/vein survival for all diabetics combined (p
= 0.53; log rank) and for the no insulin (p
= 0.76) cohort. Lastly, a trend for better ITA/radial survival in insulin dependent diabetics after the second postoperative year did not reach significance (p
= 0.13). Conclusions: Using radial as a second arterial conduit as opposed to vein grafting did not confer a survival benefit in diabetics. This unexpected result is perhaps related to relatively diminished radial graft patency and/or the augmented radial vasoreactivity characteristic of diabetics. These findings indicate that the radial survival advantage demonstrated in the general CABG population lies primarily in non-diabetics in whom this advantage may be underestimated.
Key Words: Coronary artery disease Arterial grafting Diabetes mellitus Insulin Kaplan–Meier survival Outcomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Sequential radial artery grafts for multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: 10-year survival and angiography results. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P Taggart, L. Balacumaraswami, and A. Venkatapathy Radial Artery Jump Graft from Anterior to Posterior Descending Coronary Artery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 143 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zacharias, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Late Results of Conventional Versus All-Arterial Revascularization Based on Internal Thoracic and Radial Artery Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 19 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |