HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hongxin, L. Articles by Zou, C.-w. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hongxin, L. Articles by Zou, C.-w. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic Minimally invasive surgery

Intraoperative device closure of large secundum atrial septal defects; a safe alternative to transcatheter closure

^a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, No. 324 Jingwu Road, Jinan 250021, China
^b Department of Internal Medicine, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan, China
^c Department of Ultrasonics, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China

Received 20 October 2007; received in revised form 8 January 2008; accepted 14 January 2008.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 531 86861480. (Email: cwzou{at}hotmail.com).

Objective: The aim of this study is to report our short and mid-term results of intraoperative device closure (IODC) in large secundum atrial septal defects (ASD), to evaluate its safety and to determine the impact of ‘short’ rim on the results. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with an ASD underwent IODC through a right minithoracotomy. Patients were divided into two groups: 37 patients in group I with one short rim (5 mm) and 31 in group II with sufficient rims. A 2.5–3 cm parasternal incision was made in the right third or fourth intercostal space. A specially designed plastic sheath loaded with the device was inserted through the purse-string sutures placed on the right atrium. Under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance, it was advanced through the ASD into the left atrium and the device was deployed in place. Results: The procedure was successful in all patients. The maximum diameter of the ASD ranged from 20 to 37 mm (mean 25 ± 5 mm). There were 16 patients with the diameter of ASD more than 30 mm. The mean size of implanted devices was 29 ± 4 mm. Redeployment with larger device occurred in seven patients in group I and three in group II (p > 0.05). Intracardiac manipulation time was 22 ± 10 min in group I and 16 ± 11 min in group II (p < 0.01). The total occlusion rate was 84% immediately after operation, 97% at 3 months, 98% at 1 year, and 100% at 2-, 3-, 4-year follow-up. There were no other late complications during the follow-up period of 3–63 months (mean 27 ± 18 months). Conclusions: IODC is a safe and feasible technique in closing large ASDs. It has the advantages of cost savings, cosmetic results, and less trauma. Early and mid-term results are encouraging. In patients with ASD of a short rim, a larger device is recommended which does not influence the success rate of IODC.

Key Words: Atrial septal defect • Minimally invasive surgery • Transcatheter closure • Device