EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:113-117. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.027
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Philip A.R. Hayward
Brian F. Buxton
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayward, P. A.R.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B. F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayward, P. A.R.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Coronary disease

Effect of radial artery or saphenous vein conduit for the second graft on 6-year clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Results of a randomised trial

Philip A.R. Haywarda, David L. Hareb, Ian Gordonc, Brian F. Buxtonb,*

a The Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Nethermayne, Essex, United Kingdom
b Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
c Statistical Consulting Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Received 3 September 2007; received in revised form 6 March 2008; accepted 19 March 2008.

* Corresponding author. Address: Victorian Heart Centre, Epworth Hospital, Bridge Road, Richmond, Victoria, Australia. Tel.: +61 3 9429 4055; fax: +61 3 9428 7118. (Email: brianbuxton{at}ozemail.com.au).

Objectives: In order to determine the best conduit for coronary targets other than the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, long-term clinical outcomes following revascularisation with a radial artery or saphenous vein graft were evaluated as part of the radial artery patency and clinical outcomes (RAPCO) study. Methods: As part of the RAPCO protocol for this prospective, randomised, single-centre trial, patients aged over 70 years undergoing primary CABG were randomly assigned to use of a radial artery (n = 113) or saphenous vein (n = 112) to revascularise the best non-LAD coronary vessel. Follow-up was annual. Primary clinical end-points were death, myocardial infarction or need for revascularisation. Data were analysed by intention to treat. Results: The preoperative demographics (age, gender, presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus) and urgency of surgery did not differ significantly between the two groups. The allocated arterial or venous conduit was utilised as intended in 104/113 and 110/112 patients, respectively. Mean number of grafts was 3.2 ± 0.9 and 3.3 ± 0.7 in the two groups. During follow-up of mean duration 6.2 years (maximum 10.8 years) there were 16 deaths in each group and 9 vs 13 other events in the radial artery and saphenous vein groups, respectively. These clinical outcomes did not differ significantly (log rank p = 0.98 for survival and p = 0.52 for event-free survival). Conclusions: Use of a radial artery or saphenous vein for the second graft during primary CABG does not significantly influence clinical outcome at 6 years. Mean 5-year angiographic patency data are awaited, but from the patient's perspective the likelihood of a satisfactory long-term result is equivalent, whichever conduit is used.

Key Words: Coronary artery disease • CABG • Radial artery • Mortality







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.