HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Dumbor L. Ngaage Michael E. Cowen Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ngaage, D. L. Articles by Cale, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ngaage, D. L. Articles by Cale, A. R. Related Collections Cardiac - other Congestive Heart Failure Extracorporeal circulation

Cardiopulmonary bypass and left ventricular systolic dysfunction impacts operative mortality differently in elderly and young patients

Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Hull, East Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Received 18 August 2008; received in revised form 23 October 2008; accepted 28 October 2008.

^_* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Hull, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 1482 623256; fax: +44 1482 623257. (Email: dngaage{at}yahoo.com).

Objective: Cardiac surgery is higher risk in the elderly. It has been suggested that preoperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) affect elderly and young patients differently. This study investigates the predictive risk of preoperative LVSD and CPB time for operative mortality in the two groups of patients. Methods: We reviewed the data for 2616 consecutive patients aged 70 years and 4078 young patients who had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve surgery between March 1998 and January 2007. Subgroups defined by severity of LVSD (ejection fraction >0.50 [mild], 0.31–0.50 [moderate] and 0.30 [severe]) were analysed. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors among elderly and young patients. Results: Elderly patients were higher risk and more often underwent valve operation. Moderate and severe LVSD were present in 22% (n = 566) and 6% (n = 155) of elderly compared to 18% (n = 739) and 5% (n = 215) of young patients (p = 0.001). Operative mortality for CABG was higher in elderly patients with mild (2.3% vs 0.7%, p < 0.0001), moderate (4.7% vs 2.3%, p = 0.04) and severe LVSD (13.5% vs 8.8%, p = 0.01). Although CPB times for similar procedures were equivalent for the two groups, procedure-specific mortality rates were higher among elderly patients for all operations. Whereas age (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.15, p = 0.002) and CPB time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0–1.02, p < 0.0001) were predictors for operative mortality for the elderly, they (age [OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.96–1.05, p = 0.87], CPB time [OR 1.0, 95% CI 1.0–1.01, p = 0.17]) were not for young patients. Moderate LVSD was a risk factor for young patients (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.45–6.26, p = 0.003) but not for the elderly (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.77–2.29, p = 0.30). Conclusion: Differences in the significance of risk factors between elderly and young patients contribute to the disproportionate operative mortalities. Our data showed that age and CPB duration increased the risk of operative mortality only in the elderly, but the impact of moderate, unlike severe, LVSD was tempered. Further studies are warranted to investigate more biocompatible bypass systems in elderly patients, and if current risk stratification should, perhaps, be revised for elderly patients.

Key Words: Elderly • Operative mortality • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction • Cardiopulmonary bypass