|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reviews |
Clinical Operational Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, UCL, London WC1H 0BT, United Kingdom
Received 19 June 2008; accepted 26 August 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 7957 168754. (Email: tom.treasure{at}gmail.com).
New technologies are expensive. The health care budget cannot expand indefinitely so if new treatments are introduced they may have to displace other treatments, or prevent other new treatments coming into practice. This is not simply a money saving exercise; it is accepted that new high technology treatments may cost more to implement but they must be worth the money spent in comparison with other treatments. Therefore cardiothoracic surgeons must first demonstrate that our treatments are effective. Then we need evidence of cost effectiveness in comparison with other therapies.
Key Words: Evidence based medicine Clinical trials Innovation Emerging technology
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Moghissi Editorial comment: Are randomised trials needed in the era of rapidly evolving technologies? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 35(3): 478 - 479. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |