EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:829-832. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.025
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Federico González-Aragoneses
Carlos Simón
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garutti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benito, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garutti, I.
Right arrow Articles by Benito, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Chest wall

Thoracic paravertebral block after thoracotomy: comparison of three different approaches

Ignacio Garutti*, Federico González-Aragoneses, Maria Teresa Biencinto, Emma Novoa, Carlos Simón, Nicolás Moreno, Patricia Cruz, Carmen Benito

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Street Doctor Esquerdo 46, Madrid 28007, Spain

Received 31 May 2008; received in revised form 29 December 2008; accepted 12 January 2009.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 91 5868367; fax: +34 91 5868367. (Email: ngaruttimartinez{at}yahoo.es).

Background: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a regional block technique increasingly used for the early management of post-thoracotomy pain. We compare three different postoperative analgesic approaches based on TPVB: anesthetist, anesthetist plus surgeon, and surgeon. Materials and methods: We randomized 54 patients undergoing elective thoracotomy to three different postoperative analgesia groups: paravertebral percutaneous catheter (PVA group), paravertebral percutaneous catheter plus incisional (subcutaneous) catheter (PVA + Inc), and paravertebral catheter under direct vision (PVS group). During early postoperative 48 h, we measured pain intensity, intravenous morphine afforded by the patient-controlled analgesia pump, and the spirometric test. Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the collected preoperative data. No significant differences were observed on postoperative spirometric values. Analgesic quality was better in PVA + Inc group at 12 and 24 postoperative hours. In this group, intravenous morphine use to improve analgesia was significantly lower from 8 h until 48 h postoperative. Conclusions: Association of thoracic paravertebral block to continuous infusion of a local anesthetic in the surgical incision area affords a better pain relief than paravertebral block alone (introduced by the surgeon or the anesthetist).

Key Words: Post-thoracotomy pain • Thoracic paravertebral block • Thoracotomy • Incisional analgesia • Spirometry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.