|
|
||||||||
a King Faisal Heart Institute, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
b Labatt Family Heart Center, Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Received 7 September 2008; received in revised form 5 February 2009; accepted 9 February 2009.
* Corresponding author. Address: King Faisal Heart Institute (MBC 16), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia. Tel.: +966 1 464 7272x32049; fax: +966 1 442 7791. (Email: balsoufi{at}hotmail.com).
Objective: Application of extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) following pediatric cardiac surgery varies between different institutions based on manpower availability and philosophy towards ECLS utilization. We examined a large single institution experience with postoperative ECLS in children aiming to identify outcome predictors. Methods: Hospital records of all children who required postoperative ECLS at our institution were reviewed. Patients demographics, cardiac anatomy, surgical and ECLS support details were entered into a multivariable regression analysis to determine factors associated with survival. Results: Between 1990 and 2007, 180 consecutive children, median age 109 days (range: 1 day–16.9 years), required postoperative ECLS. Sixty-nine children (38%) had undergone palliative treatment for single ventricle pathology. ECLS support was required for failure to separate from cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 83) or for postoperative low cardiac output state (n = 97). Forty-eight patients (27%) received rescue extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support during active chest compression for refractory cardiac arrest. Under ECLS support, 37 patients required surgical revision and 20 received orthotopic heart transplantation. One hundred and nine patients (61%) survived >24 h following ECLS discontinuation and 68 (38%) were discharged alive. Hospital survivors required shorter ECLS support duration compared to non-survivors (median 3 vs 5 days, respectively, p = 0.05) however survival occurred after up to 16 days of ECLS support. ECLS indication (OR: 0.85 for failure to separate from bypass vs postoperative low cardiac output 95% CI (0.47–1.56), p = 0.62) and rescue ECMO (OR: 0.63 for rescue ECMO vs not 95%CI (0.32–1.24), p = 0.18) were not associated with risk of mortality. In a multivariable logistic regression model, neurological complications (p = 0.0007), prolonged ECLS duration (p = 0.003), repeat ECLS requirement (p = 0.02), renal dysfunction (p = 0.04) and not performing heart transplantation (p = 0.04) were significant factors for hospital death. Conclusion: ECLS plays a valuable role in children with low cardiac output state following cardiac surgery. More than one third of those patients, including young neonates, older children, patients with single ventricle, or those requiring rescue ECMO can be salvaged. Although prognosis worsens with prolonged ECLS duration, survival can be noted up to 16 days of support. Heart transplantation is often an important ECLS exit strategy and should be considered early in selected children. Patients survival could improve if renal and neurological complications are avoided.
Key Words: Congenital heart disease Cardiac arrest Extra-corporeal life support Single ventricle
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |