HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Victor T. Tsang Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Puranik, R. Articles by Taylor, A. M. PubMed Articles by Puranik, R. Articles by Taylor, A. M. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic Great vessels

Late magnetic resonance surveillance of repaired coarctation of the aorta

^a Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS trust, Cardiac Unit, London UK
^b Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS trust, Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, London, UK
^c The Heart Hospital, NHS trust, London, UK

Received 19 August 2008; received in revised form 19 February 2009; accepted 23 February 2009.

^_* Corresponding author. Address: Great Ormond Street Hospital, Cardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK. Tel.: +44 2078138106; fax: +44 2078138262. (Email: a.taylor{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk).

Objective: Coarctation of the aorta has often been described as a simple form of congenital heart disease. However, rates of re-coarctation reported in the literature vary from 7% to 60%. Re-coarctation of the aorta may lead to worsening systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease and/or congestive cardiac failure. We aimed to describe the rates of re-coarctation in subjects who had undergone early coarctation repair (<2 years of age) and referred for clinically indicated or routine magnetic resonance (MR) surveillance. Methods: We retrospectively identified 50 consecutive subjects (20.2 ± 6.9 years post-repair) imaged between 2004 and 2008. Patient characteristics, rates of re-coarctation and LV/aortic dimensions were examined. Results: Forty percent of subjects had bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). There were 40 cases of end-to-end repair and 10 cases of subclavian flap repair. Re-intervention with balloon angioplasty or repeat surgery had been performed in 32% of subjects. The MRI referrals were clinically indicated in 34% and routine in 66% of patients. Re-coarctation was considered moderate or severe in 34%, mild in 34% and no re-coarctation was identified in 32% of patients. There was no significant difference in the number of cases of re-coarctation identified in the clinically indicated versus routine referrals for MR imaging (p = 0.20). There were no cases of aortic dissection or aneurysm formation identified amongst the subjects. The mean indexed left ventricular mass and ejection fraction was 72 ± 16 g/m² and 66 ± 6%, respectively. Amongst those subjects with BAV there were larger aortic sinus (30 ± 1 mm vs 27 ± 1 mm, p = 0.03) and ascending aortic (27 ± 1 mm vs 23 ± 1 mm, p = 0.01) dimensions when compared to subjects with morphologically tricuspid aortic valves. Conclusions: We demonstrate that many years after early repair of coarctation of the aorta, MR surveillance detects significant rates of re-coarctation. These findings were independent of whether or not there was a clinical indication for imaging. Those patients with BAV disease had larger ascending aortic dimensions and may require more frequent non-invasive surveillance.

Key Words: Coarctation • Aorta • Surgery • Magnetic resonance imaging