EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:589-591. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.036
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Martin Misfeld
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charitos, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Misfeld, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Charitos, E. I.
Right arrow Articles by Misfeld, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease


How-to-do-it

Valve-sparing aortic root remodeling with partial preservation of the intact native aortic sinuses

Efstratios I. Charitos1, Ulrich Stierle1, Hans-Hinrich Sievers*, Martin Misfeld

Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany

Received 24 February 2009; received in revised form 24 May 2009; accepted 27 May 2009.

* Corresponding author. Address: Clinic of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany. Tel.: +49 451 5002108; fax: +49 451 5002051. (Email: h.sievers{at}herzchirurgie-luebeck.de).

There are certain aortic root pathologies where only one or two of the aortic sinuses are diseased. We aimed to evaluate our mid-term results after a partial remodeling of the aortic root. A total of 220 patients underwent a valve-sparing operation at our institution. In 29 patients (mean age: 62 ± 10 years), two (n = 22) or one (n = 7) native aortic sinuses were preserved. Operative indication was type A aortic dissection (n = 12) or aortic root aneurysm (n = 17). Preoperative aortic valve regurgitation was 1.8 ± 1.1 grades. Mean follow-up time was 46 ± 32 months. At the latest follow-up, 23 patients were alive and asymptomatic. One ascending aorta re-operation was observed due to late aortic graft infection. Echocardiographic measurements at latest follow-up were excellent: aortic regurgitation: 0.6 ± 0.5 grades; aortic valve area: 2.7 ± 0.7 cm2; aortic root dimensions: anulus 23 ± 3 mm, sinus 34 ± 5 mm, sinotubular junction 28 ± 5 mm and ascending aorta: 30 ± 2 mm. Longitudinal analysis revealed no development of clinically significant aortic regurgitation (<0.03 grades per year). However, in contrast to the group that underwent complete remodeling (n = 108), a significant dilatation at sinus and ST junction (STJ) level could be observed in the partial remodeling group over time (0.35 and 0.48 mm per year, respectively). This should be taken into consideration when applying this technique in patients operated on an elective basis.

Key Words: Aortic root • Aortic valve repair • Heart valve • Valve disease







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.