EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:708-714. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.057
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Francesco Maisano
Henrik K. Kjærgård
Robert Bauernschmitt
Alain Pavie
Marc Laskar
Volkmar Falk
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maisano, F.
Right arrow Articles by Falk, V.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maisano, F.
Right arrow Articles by Falk, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Francesco Maisanoa,*, Henrik K. Kjærgårdb, Robert Bauernschmittc, Alain Pavied, Gregorio Rábagoe, Marc Laskarf, Jens Pauli Marsteing, Volkmar Falkh

a Istituto Scientifico H San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan 20132, Italy
b Rigshospitalet Heart and Lung Surgical Clinic, Copenhagen, Denmark
c German Heart Center, Cardiovascular Surgery, Munich, Germany
d Heart Institute Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
e Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Navarra, Spain
f University Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
g Nycomed, Roskilde, Denmark
h Heart Center Leipzig, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig, Germany

Received 5 February 2009; received in revised form 29 April 2009; accepted 30 April 2009.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 02 2643 7111; fax: +39 02 2643 7125. (Email: francesco.maisano{at}hsr.it).

Objective: Prolonged bleeding during cardiovascular surgery presents a risk for the patient and increases the time and cost of surgery. TachoSil® is a ready-to-use haemostatic agent that consists of an equine collagen patch coated with human fibrinogen and thrombin. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety (≤30 days post-surgery) of TachoSil surgical patch compared with standard haemostatic fleece for the control of bleeding in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective surgery on the heart, ascending aorta or aortic arch requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible for this open-label multicentre trial. After primary haemostatic measures, patients were randomised to TachoSil or conventional haemostatic fleece if an area of persisting haemorrhage was identified (target area). After the application of trial treatment, haemostasis was evaluated at 3 min (primary endpoint). If haemostasis was not achieved, trial treatment was re-applied and haemostasis assessed at 6 min (secondary endpoint). Results: A total of 120 patients were randomised and 119 received trial treatment (TachoSil, n = 59; standard treatment, n = 60). Twenty-six percent of patients were female and the mean age was 67 years (range: 23–86 years). Baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. Bleeding occurred mainly from the aorta (56%), right ventricle (16%) or right atrium (13%), more often from a vessel (68%) than tissue (32%), and was assessed to be arterial in 74% of cases. TachoSil was significantly superior to standard haemostatic fleece in controlling bleeding after insufficient primary haemostasis, with 75% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64–0.86) of the TachoSil group achieving haemostasis at 3 min compared with only 33% (95% CI: 0.21–0.45) of the standard treatment group (p < 0.0001). This difference persisted at 6 min, with 95% of patients achieving haemostasis in the TachoSil group compared with 72% in the standard treatment group (p = 0.0006). Three (5%) TachoSil patients compared with 17 (28%) standard treatment patients failed to achieve haemostasis at 6 min and received rescue treatment. TachoSil was well tolerated with adverse events generally similar in the two treatment groups. Conclusions: TachoSil was significantly superior to standard haemostatic fleece material in obtaining effective and fast intra-operative haemostasis in cardiovascular surgical procedures. TachoSil was safe and well tolerated.

Key Words: Cardiovascular surgical procedures • Haemostasis • TachoSil







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.