HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Bernhard Voss Robert Bauernschmitt Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Voss, B. Articles by Bauernschmitt, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Voss, B. Articles by Bauernschmitt, R. Related Collections Extracorporeal circulation

Cardiopulmonary bypass with physiological flow and pressure curves: pulse is unnecessary!

^a Klinik für Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
^b Institut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
^c Lehrstuhl für Produktentwicklung, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

Received 1 September 2008; received in revised form 4 April 2009; accepted 5 May 2009.

^_* Corresponding author. Address: Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636 Munich, Germany. Tel.: +49 89 1218 4062; fax: +49 89 1218 4123. (Email: voss{at}dhm.mhn.de).

Objective: Advocates of pulsatile flow postulate that the flow pattern during extracorporeal circulation (ECC) should be similar to the physiological one. However, the waveforms generated by clinically used pulsatile pumps are by far different from the physiological ones. Therefore, we constructed a new computer-controlled pulsator which can provide nearly physiological perfusion patterns during ECC. We compared its effect (group 1) with pulsatile (group 2) and non-pulsatile (group 3) perfusion generated by a conventional roller pump. Methods: Thirty pigs (10 per group) underwent 180 min ECC with an aortic cross-clamp time of 120 min. Pulse pressure, peak aortic flow, dp/dt _max, pulsatility index and energy-equivalent pressure were measured online. Renal and intestinal blood flow was calculated by fluorescent microspheres. The inflammatory response was assessed by the level of interleukin 6/1ra, the haemolysis by the free haemoglobin, and the escape rate of plasma protein by the disappearance rate of Evans Blue dye. Results: When compared to the preoperative curves, pulsatile waveforms during ECC were similar in group 1 and severely damped in group 2. Inflammatory response increased without significant differences between the groups. There were no differences between groups in renal and bowel blood flow. Free haemoglobin after ECC was higher in the pulsatile groups (group 1 = 43 ± 144 mg dl^–1, group 2 = 40 ± 164 mg dl^–1, group 3 = 11 ± 4 mg dl^–1; group 1 vs 2 (ns); group 1 or 2 vs 3 (p < 0.001)). The escape rate of Evans Blue increased after ECC in group 1 1.8-fold (p < 0.05), in group 2 1.45-fold (p < 0.05) and in group 3 1.27-fold (ns). Conclusion: Even when using pulsatile flow patterns which mimic closely the physiological waveforms, there is no advantage concerning organ perfusion or inflammatory response. Moreover, the extent of haemolysis and capillary leak is higher compared to non-pulsatile perfusion. Efforts to optimise pulsatility are not justified.

Key Words: Extracorporeal circulation • Pulsatile flow • Non-pulsatile flow • Microcirculation • Energy-equivalent pressure • Capillary leak