HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chambers, D. J. Articles by Braimbridge, M. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chambers, D. J. Articles by Braimbridge, M. V.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 4, 549-555, Copyright © 1990 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

ARTICLES

Comparison of standard (non-oxygenated) vs. oxygenated St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No. 2 (Plegisol)

DJ Chambers, S Kosker, A Takahashi, A Sakai, S Baharakakis, G Manzanera, RA Jupp, LD Smith and MV Braimbridge
Cardiovascular Research (Surgical Cytochemistry), Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Recent studies have suggested that oxygenation of crystalloid cardioplegic solutions improves myocardial preservation. To assess whether oxygenation of St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No. 2 (Plegisol) improves its clinical efficacy, 50 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: (1) those receiving Plegisol and (2) those receiving O2-Plegisol (PO2 greater than 500 mmHg at 4 degrees C). Efficacy was assessed by (a) clinical and haemodynamic parameters, (b) quantitative birefringence changes in response to ATP and calcium as a measurement of myocardial preservation in left and right ventricular biopsies, (c) creatine kinase (MB isoenzyme) release for up to 4 days postoperatively, (d) electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring for up to 7 days postoperatively. There were no differences in mean age, ejection fraction, aortic cross-clamp duration, or bypass duration between the 2 groups of patients. In the Plegisol group, 2 patients (8%) died and 4 patients (16%) required inotropic support, whereas in the O2-Plegisol group there were no deaths and only 2 patients (8%) required inotropic support. These differences, however, were not statistically significant. Birefringence assessment demonstrated an improved myocardial response to ATP and calcium (predominantly in the left ventricular epimyocardium and in the right ventricular biopsies) at the end of ischaemia and after reperfusion in patients given O2-Plegisol. Deterioration in cellular assessment of myocardial contractility (measured by a reduction in birefringence of greater than 0.4 nm) was reduced from 20% in Plegisol patients to 12.5% in O2-Plegisol patients. CK-MB values showed no difference at any sampling time between the 2 groups of patients; a mean peak CK-MB of 35 IU/l occurred 2 h postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bessho and D. J. Chambers Myocardial protection with oxygenated esmolol cardioplegia during prolonged normothermic ischemia in the rat J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 340 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]