EJCTS Click here to locate an Ethicon representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saita, S.
Right arrow Articles by D'Arrigo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saita, S.
Right arrow Articles by D'Arrigo, M.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 4, 270-272, Copyright © 1990 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Bronchial brushing and biopsy: a comparative evaluation in diagnosing visible bronchial lesions

S Saita, A Tanzillo, C Riscica, A Maresca, E Potenza and M D'Arrigo
Institute of Surgical Pathology II, University of Catania, Italy.

One hundred and forty patients underwent 142 brushings and conventional biopsies of suspected malignant lesions of the lung through a fibreoptic bronchoscope. Both samples were taken from the same area. One hundred and three patients showed positive results on brushing and 90 on biopsy. Thirty-nine diagnoses were negative on brushing and 52 on biopsy. A correct cell typing was obtained in 105 of 109 diagnoses of malignancy. Final diagnoses showed 118 malignant lesions and 22 benign conditions. False positives were respectively, 2 on brushing and 1 on biopsy, while false negatives were 17 on brushing and 30 on biopsy. Brushing showed higher sensitivity (85.5%) and accuracy (86.6%) than biopsy. A combination of the two techniques gives an accuracy rate of 94.3%.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. P. Rivera and A. C. Mehta
Initial Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 131S - 148S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Baram, R. B. Garcia, and P. S. Richman
Impact of Rapid On-Site Cytologic Evaluation During Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 869 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Schreiber and D. C. McCrory
Performance Characteristics of Different Modalities for Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer: Summary of Published Evidence
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1_suppl): 115S - 128S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1990 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.