EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zenati, M.
Right arrow Articles by Casarotto, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zenati, M.
Right arrow Articles by Casarotto, D.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 5, 266-271, Copyright © 1991 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Immunosuppression with aerosolized cyclosporine for prevention of lung rejection in a rat model

M Zenati, AJ Duncan, GJ Burckart, M Schaper, SA Yousem, BP Griffith and D Casarotto
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, Italy.

The efficacy of local delivery of aerosol cyclosporine (CsA) for prevention of lung rejection was compared with the intramuscular route (IM) in a fully allogeneic rat model (BN/LEW) of lung transplantation (LTx). Control rats (group 1, n = 6) received no CsA after LTx. Rats in group 2 (n = 10) received 4 doses of CsA in olive oil (25 mg/kg) intramuscularly starting on postoperative day (POD) 0. Group 3 (n = 9) was treated with aerosolized CsA for 3 h/day for 7 days starting on POD 0. All animals were sacrificed on POD 6. Transplanted lungs were graded histologically in a blind manner on a 0-4 scale. Control animals all showed grade 4 rejection. i.m. CsA therapy reduced lung rejection with a rejection grade of 1.8 +/- 0.35 (mean +/- SD) but was associated with a 50% incidence of pneumonia. Aerosol CsA provided better control of rejection with a rejection grade of 1.2 +/- 0.4 (group 3 vs. group 2: P less than 0.05 Wilcoxon) and none of these animals had penumonia. Trough blood levels of CsA were significantly lower in the group treated with aerosolized CsA when compared with the IM group (P less than 0.05). Therefore we conclude that: (1) aerosol CsA is effective in preventing lung allograft rejection following lung transplantation in rats, and (2) local delivery of aerosol CsA is superior to the i.m. route because better control of rejection is achieved with a lower systemic delivery of CsA.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. N. Mitruka, S. M. Pham, A. Zeevi, S. Li, J. Cai, G. J. Burckart, S. A. Yousem, R. J. Keenan, and B. P. Griffith
Aerosol cyclosporine prevents acute allograft rejection in experimental lung transplantation
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 1998; 115(1): 28 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1991 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.