EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Moghissi, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharpe, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Moghissi, K.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 6, 561-564, Copyright © 1992 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Antibiotic prophylaxis in oesophageal surgery

DA Sharpe, P Renwick, KH Mathews and K Moghissi
North Humberside Cardiothoracic Centre, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.

A prospective randomised study to assess the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in oesophageal surgery was performed, in which 226 consecutive patients (113 male and 113 female, age range 24-86 years, mean age of 65 years) were included. The study patients were in two groups: group 1, in which the upper alimentary tract was opened during surgery, and group 2, in which it was not. The group 1 patients (n = 129) were randomised to one of three antibiotic prophylaxis regimes prior to surgery. Group A patients (n = 42) were treated with cefuroxime (CFX) 1.5 g at induction of anaesthesia and then CFX 750 mg b.i.d. for 4 days. Group B patients (n = 46) were treated with CFX 1.5 g and metronidazole (MTR) 1.0 g at induction of anaesthesia, then CFX 750 mg b.i.d. and MTR 500 mg qds for 4 days. Group C (n = 41) treated with CFX 1.5 g and MTR 1.0 g at the induction of anaesthesia. Group 2 (n = 97) was divided into two groups, group D (n = 47) treated with CFX 1.5 g on induction of anaesthesia alone. Group E (n = 50) treated with CFX 1.5 g on induction of anaesthesia then CFX 750 mg bd for 2 days. We found a significantly higher incidence of infective complications in subgroup C (43.9%) and subgroup A (21.4%) compared to subgroup B (8.6%). This difference was most marked in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. We found significantly higher infection rates of infective complications in subgroup D (10.6%) as compared to subgroup E (2%).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.