EJCTS Click here to locate an Ethicon representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moulijn, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moulijn, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, C. A.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 6, 122-126, Copyright © 1992 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Intraoperative assessment of the mitral valve: transesophageal Doppler echocardiography vs. left ventricular filling of the flaccid heart

AC Moulijn, YM Smulders, JJ Koolen, WJ Voorn and CA Visser
Department of Cardiopulmonary Surgery, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Several methods can be used for the intraoperative assessment of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) following reconstruction of the mitral valve. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of two of these methods: left ventricular filling of the arrested heart with saline (LVF) and intraoperative transesophageal Doppler echocardiography (TEE). Reliability was assessed by comparing LVF and TEE to postoperative left ventricular angiography (LVA) in 27 patients. LVF, TEE and LVA grading of MR was 0-4. Correlations, as measured by the Kappa statistic, were as follows: LVF-LVA: K = 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.59), TEE-LVA: K = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.20-0.77), LVF- TEE: K = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.20-0.67). Considering LVF and TEE as predictors of LVA gradings above 2, sensitivities were 0.4 and 0.6, respectively. Specificities were 1.0 for each method. In conclusion, we found TEE in the beating heart not to be significantly more reliable in the prediction of residual MR than LVF in the flaccid heart.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Bryan, B. Barzilai, and N. T. Kouchoukos
Transesophageal Echocardiography and Adult Cardiac Operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1995; 59(3): 773 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
Y. Suenaga, A. Io, K. Tajima, M.-H. Song, and T. Shimomura
Intraoperative Evaluation of Valvular Function Using Transesophageal and Epicardial Echocardiography
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 1995; 29(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.