|
|
||||||||
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 6, 256-260, Copyright © 1992 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
O Jegaden, M Perinetti, M Barthelet, C Vedrinne, F Delahaye, P Montagna and PH Mikaeloff
Between 1974 and 1990, 58 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement
with porcine bioprostheses (Hancock 42, Carpentier-Edwards 16) during
multiple valve replacement (double, 21; triple, 37). Perioperative
mortality was 12%; 16 patients died later, mostly from cardiac causes.
Actuarial survival (1 patient lost to follow-up) was 81% +/- 11% at 5
years, and 60 +/- 17% at 10 years. Reoperation because of Hancock
prosthesis deterioration was performed in 2 patients at 11 and 15 years,
respectively. At last follow-up (mean 108 +/- 48 months), 82% of survivors
(28/34) were functionally improved. Doppler echocardiography was performed
in 29 patients in February 1991. In 21 patients, after 88 +/- 40 months of
follow-up, the bioprosthesis was normal, there was no leaflet malformation,
no significant tricuspid regurgitation and the mean diastolic
transprosthetic gradient (DTPG) was 3.8 +/- 1.7 mmHg. In 7 patients
(follow-up: 129 +/- 40 months, P less than 0.05), there was moderate
dysfunction (all Hancock prostheses) with leaflet sclerosis, tricuspid
regurgitation grade 2, and mean DTPG 5.7 +/- 1.8 mmHg (P less than 0.05).
Only 1 patient (Hancock prosthesis implanted in 1981) had severe tricuspid
prosthesis stenosis with very thickened leaflets and mean DTPG 13 mmHg.
Pulmonary artery hypertension (most often fixed) was present in 11
patients, associated with a poor functional result and a significantly
higher DTPG. We conclude that porcine bioprostheses in tricuspid position
have an acceptable long-term durability and satisfactory performance.
Prosthetic dysfunction correlates with the length of follow-up of patients
and with the presence of fixed pulmonary artery hypertension.
ARTICLES
Long-term results of porcine bioprostheses in the tricuspid position
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular and Pneumologic Hospital, Lyon, France.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kobayashi, T. Asou, Z.-B. Lin, Y. Takeda, K. Ohara, and H. Yoshimura Bioprosthetic Dysfunction Caused by Preserved Native Valve in Tricuspid Position Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2005; 13(1): 72 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Ratnatunga, M.-B. Edwards, C. J. Dore, and K. M. Taylor Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 1940 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Scully and C. S. Armstrong Tricuspid valve replacement: Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1995; 109(6): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |