EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Spyt, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Spyt, T. J.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 6, 267-271, Copyright © 1992 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Carbomedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet valves: an in vitro and in vivo comparison

RT Johnston, NA Weerasena, M Butterfield, J Fisher and TJ Spyt
Regional Cardiothoracic Unit, Groby Road Hospital, Leicester, UK.

The hydrodynamic and haemodynamic function of 29 mm mitral and 23 mm aortic St Jude Medical (SJM) and CarboMedics (CM) heart valves have been compared in a pulsatile flow simulator in the laboratory and by doppler ultrasound in vivo. The laboratory studies showed that there was no significant difference in the pressure drop across the valves. The valves also had similar regurgitant volumes. Doppler ultrasound confirmed these results with a mean pressure drop of 12.9 +/- 5.5 mmHg across the CM aortic valves and 12.6 +/- 5.5 mmHg for the SJM aortic valves. The mean mitral diastolic pressure drops were 3.8 +/- 1.8 and 4.6 +/- 1.4 mmHg for the CM and SJM valves, respectively. Mild aortic regurgitation was detected in 5 of 14 patients in the CM group and 1 out of 6 patients in the SJM group, though none of the cases were clinically significant. Both the in vitro and in vivo results show these valves to have acceptable and comparable function.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, T. Absi, and S. Aranki
Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1031 - 1068.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
T. Gudbjartsson, S. Aranki, and L. H. Cohn
Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 951 - 986.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. F. Nistal, A. Hurle, J. M. Revuelta, and M. Gandarillas
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE CARBOMEDICS VALVE: EARLY RESULTS WITH A NEW BILEAFLET MECHANICAL PROSTHESIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1996; 112(1): 59 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Laske, R. Jenni, M. Maloigne, G. Vassalli, O. Bertel, and M. I. Turina
Pressure Gradients Across Bileaflet Aortic Valves by Direct Measurement and Echocardiography
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1996; 61(1): 48 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.