EJCTS Click here to locate an Ethicon representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B.G.
Right arrow Articles by Raudkivi, P.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barratt-Boyes, B.G.
Right arrow Articles by Raudkivi, P.J.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;6:S39-S43
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

The stentless bioprosthesis: surgical challenges and implications for long-term durability

B.G. Barratt-Boyes 1 , G.W. Christie 2 , P.J. Raudkivi 1

a Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
b Systematic Solutions Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand

An attempt is made to analyse the factors which are expected to influence clinical results following implantation of a stentless porcine bioprosthesis. Long experience with implantation of allograft aortic valves provides a meaningful basis for comparison with a glutaraldehyde-fixed device. Morphological differences between the two valves involve the aortic wall and muscle shelf, and differences in valve preparation include the strength and stiffness of the aorta and the extensibility of the valve leaflets. As a result of these differences, sizing of the porcine valve is expected to be more critical than the allograft valve and the porcine valve is also expected to be more obstructive. Methods for reducing the obstructive element include the use of a composite aortic valve, a porcine pulmonary valve, or a valve in which the aorta is glutaraldehyde-fixed under pressure while the leaflets are pressure-free. The techniques available for implantation, namely freehand insertion, total root replacement and mini-root replacement, are examined.

Key Words: Porcine cardiac valves • Non-stented • Valve durability • Implantation techniques




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. H. Krause Jr
Technique for Complete Subcoronary Implantation of the Medtronic Freestyle Porcine Bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1495 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Chanda, R. Kuribayashi, and T. Abe
Prevention of Calcification in Glutaraldehyde-Treated Porcine Aortic and Pulmonary Valves
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1997; 64(4): 1063 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G.W. Christie
Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S95 - S101.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1992 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.