EJCTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, E. W.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 7, 511-513, Copyright © 1993 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Retention of bioprosthetic valve annulus in mitral prosthetic replacement

HS Paterson, A Jacob, C Campanella, P Bloomfield and EW Cameron
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

Mitral valve prosthetic replacement carries high mortality rates by modern standards, and mitral bioprostheses are particularly prone to degeneration. Bioprosthetic replacement may be technically difficult when there is calcification of the tissue ingrowth, strut incorporation, or valve-to-annulus size mismatch at the primary operation. A "valve-in-valve" technique is described where the mechanical prosthesis is implanted in the bioprosthetic annulus in order to avoid such difficulties. The results in the first eight patients are presented, showing post-operative Doppler-derived transvalvar mean gradients between 3.9 mmHg and 7.5 mmHg, and estimated valve areas between 1.9 cm2 and 3.5 cm2. All patients are alive at between 20 and 30 months (mean 23.6 months) after operation, they are without serious post-operative morbidity and are in functional class I or II (NYHA classification).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J.-P. Chang, C.-L. Kao, K.-T. Tsai, M.-J. Hsieh, and M. Fu
Conduit-on-valve replacement of a degenerated mitral bioprosthesis with a bioprosthesis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1987 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. S. Geha, M. G. Massad, and N. J. Snow
Replacement of degenerated mitral and aortic bioprostheses without explantation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1509 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1993 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.