EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cochrane, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cochrane, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, B. B.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 8, 194-198, Copyright © 1994 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

A comparison of amiodarone and digoxin for treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery

AD Cochrane, M Siddins, FL Rosenfeldt, R Salamonsen, L McConaghy, S Marasco and BB Davis
C.J.O.B. Cardiac Surgery Unit, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

Despite the widespread use of amiodarone in non-surgical patients, its role in the management of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery is not clear. We set out to compare the relative efficacy of amiodarone and digoxin in the management of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the early postoperative period. This prospective randomised trial comprised 30 patients, previously in sinus rhythm, who developed sustained atrial fibrillation or flutter following myocardial revascularisation, valve surgery or combined procedures. Amiodarone was administered as an intravenous loading dose followed by a continuous infusion. Digoxin was given as an intravenous loading dose followed by oral maintenance therapy. Electrocardiographic and haemodynamic monitoring was continued for 24 h after the commencement of treatment. There was a marked reduction in heart rate in both groups, mainly in the first 6 h, from 146 to 89 beats per minute in the amiodarone group and from 144 to 95 in the digoxin group. At the end of the 24 h, one of the 15 patients in the amiodarone group and 3 of the 15 patients in the digoxin group remained in atrial fibrillation. No patient in either group developed adverse reactions. We conclude that intravenous amiodarone therapy is safe and at least as effective as digoxin in the initial management of arrhythmias after cardiac surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. A. Albert, N. Halevy, and E. M. Antman
Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 261 - 280.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. Dunning, T. Treasure, M. Versteegh, S. A.M. Nashef, and on behalf of the EACTS Audit and Guidelines Commit
Guidelines on the prevention and management of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac and thoracic surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 30(6): 852 - 872.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. A. Martinez, E. B. Bass, and P. Zimetbaum
Pharmacologic Control of Rhythm: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 48S - 55S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. A. Martinez, A. E. Epstein, and E. B. Bass
Pharmacologic Control of Ventricular Rate: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 56S - 60S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. Dunning, N. Khasati, and B. Prendergast
What is the optimal medical treatment for stable cardiac surgical patients who go into atrial fibrillation after their operation?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 46 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. M. Letelier, K. Udol, J. Ena, B. Weaver, and G. H. Guyatt
Effectiveness of Amiodarone for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm: A Meta-analysis
Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2003; 163(7): 777 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
M. A. Albert and E. M. Antman
Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 235 - 248.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
G Nichol, F McAlister, B Pham, A Laupacis, B Shea, M Green, A Tang, and G Wells
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation
Heart, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 535 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. H. Maisel, J. D. Rawn, and W. G. Stevenson
Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery
Ann Intern Med, December 18, 2001; 135(12): 1061 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Soucier, S. Mirza, M. G. Abordo, E. Berns, H. C. Dalamagas, A. Hanna, and D. I. Silverman
Predictors of conversion of atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation in the absence of class I or III antiarrhythmic medications
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 694 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. W. Hogue Jr and M. L. Hyder
Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation: risks, mechanisms, and treatment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. T. VanderLugt, T. Mattioni, S. Denker, D. Torchiana, T. Ahern, L. K. Wakefield, K. T. Perry, and P. R. Kowey
Efficacy and Safety of Ibutilide Fumarate for the Conversion of Atrial Arrhythmias After Cardiac Surgery
Circulation, July 27, 1999; 100(4): 369 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
J. A. Reiffel
Intravenous Amiodarone in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(4): 199 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. R. Ommen, J. A. Odell, and M. S. Stanton
Atrial Arrhythmias after Cardiothoracic Surgery
N. Engl. J. Med., May 15, 1997; 336(20): 1429 - 1434.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
C. Baufreton, P. Le Besnerais, P. Jansen, J. P. Mazzucotelli, C. R. Wildevuur, and D. Y Loisance
Clinical outcome after coronary surgery with heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, November 1, 1996; 11(6): 437 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.