EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schmuziger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schmuziger, M.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vol 8, 500-504, Copyright © 1994 by European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery


ARTICLES

Third-time coronary bypass operation. Analysis of selection mechanisms, results and long-term follow-up

JT Christenson and M Schmuziger
Cardiovascular Unit, Hopital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.

Twenty-six patients underwent a third coronary artery revascularization between 1984 and 1993 at Hopital de la Tour, Geneva, Switzerland. These patients represent 5.4% of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) reoperations and 0.8% of the total CABG operations (3129) during the same time period. There were 23 men (85%), the mean age was 57.2 years (range 33-71), 18 patients (69%) had 3-vessel disease and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 59% (range 32-83%). The reason for the third operation was graft failure in 62% of the cases. Twenty- five patients (96%) were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 3 or 4 preoperatively. Direct myocardial revascularization was performed in all patients with a mean of 3.2 grafts per patient (range 1-6). Thromboendarterectomy was performed in six patients (23%) and patch was used in four (15%). The internal mammary artery (IMA) was utilized in 85% of the patients. In-hospital mortality was 11.5% (3 patients). Non-fatal perioperative myocardial infarction and re- exploration for bleeding did not occur in this group of patients. Respiratory failure necessitating prolonged ventilatory support occurred in five patients (19.2%). Long-term follow-up was carried out for all 23 hospital survivors. The mean follow-up time was 52 months. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 84.5% for the entire group and 95.7% for hospital survivors. The preoperative CCS functional class had significantly improved at the end of the follow-up, P < 0.001. Our data suggests that a third-time coronary revascularization can be justified, with gratifying operative success and good long-term clinical results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
I. Shapira, A. Isakov, I. Heller, M. Topilsky, and A. Pines
Long-term Follow-up After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Reoperation
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1593 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.